Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,234 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The linear A coefficient was highly significant ( p < 0.01) on TAFs’ yield, while the quadratic coefficient B 2 was significant ( p < 0.05) on TAFs yield, suggesting that the parameter of liquid–solid ratio (A) and ultrasonic temperature (C) were the two primary factors affecting the extraction yield, and the primary impact relationships of each factor were: liquid–solid ratio > ultrasonic temperature > water content in DES.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, squalene exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with ABTS ( r = 0.80; p < 0.01), potentially explaining the high ABTS radical scavenging ability of C.G ( Figure 7 b), as its squalene content was significantly higher than that of other types of camellia oils (p < 0.05) ( Figure 4 a).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
For Salmonella challenged with CPC and then neutralized, the interaction of sanitizer concentration and neutralizers concentration was highly significant ( p < 0.01) for predicting Salmonella growth or non-growth; counts of Salmonella inocula did not function as a co-variate to influence growth/no growth results ( Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
An additional correlation analysis ( Table 3 ) resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.01) correlation coefficients that ranged between 0.71 (between Fe nutritional yield and Cu nutritional yield) and 0.95 (between yield and Mg nutritional yield) for the five variables studied (yield; and Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mg nutritional yield). 3.3.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The quadratic polynomial regression model was established as follows: R = 385.32 − 118.37X 1 + 22.20X 2 − 150.79X 3 − 46.23X 1 X 2 + 92.03X 1 X 3 − 20.86X 2 X 3 + 64.94X 1 2 + 9.82X 2 2 + 133.50X 3 2 Regression and variance analyses revealed that the model for nanoparticle size was highly significant ( p < 0.01) with a non-significant lack-of-fit term ( p > 0.05).