Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,862 sentences · 1 filter applied

a statistical trendP = 0.0691.4× alphagold
Number and relative proportion of leukocyte subsets Mixed linear model analysis revealed no effect of treatment (P > 0.05) on either the absolute numbers ( Table 1 ) or the relative proportions ( Supplementary Table 2 ) of leukocyte subsets in the blood of 35-day-old broiler chickens treated in ovo with MI on ED 17, except a statistical trend in the number of CD4 + cells (P = 0.069).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0691.4× alpha
However, there was a trend toward significance for KIR2DL2 inhibitory receptor in relapse patients (13 relapse patients out of 16 are positive for KIR2DL2) when compared to non-relapse group ( p = 0.069) with a hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% CI: 0.91–11.26) (Table S3 in Supplementary Material).
marginally significantp=0.071.4× alphagold
Defined by methodology A, B, or C, higher PD-L1 group showed a better prognosis trend although the difference was marginally significant as determined by the log-rank test (p=0.07 as classified by methodology A, p=0.14 as classified by methodology B, p=0.12 as classified by methodology C, Figures 1A–C ).
an interesting trendp=0.071.4× alphagold
About other miRNAs, miR-30a showed an interesting trend resulting higher in NR vs R (p=0.07); instead, there were no statistically significant differences in miR-21, miR-22, miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-150 and miR-155 expression between two patient groups ( Supplementary Figure S6 ).
approached significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
A significantly larger proportion of total CD4 + and CD4 + T EMRA cells in SAT from diabetics were CD57 + CD69 lo CX 3 CR1 + GPR56 + compared to SAT from non-diabetics ( p = 0.051), and approached significance for CD4 + T EM cells ( p = 0.07) ( Figure 5C ).
an increasing trendP = 0.071.4× alphagold
Compared with Cluster 1, cluster 3 exhibited significantly higher activity scores for “ferroptosis” (adjusted P = 0.025, δ = −0.29), “lipid peroxidation” (adjusted P = 0.025, δ = −0.28), and “glycerolipid metabolism” (adjusted P = 0.028, δ = −0.26), along with an increasing trend for “fatty acid metabolism” (adjusted P = 0.07, δ = −0.22) ( Figure 3E ).