Excerpts

For instance, a mobile app that guides users in applying acupoint tapping protocols for anxiety and stress was investigated in a large-scale study including 270,461 app users and found highly significant ( p < 0.001) symptom reduction ( Church et al., 2020 ).

Exploratory factor analysis The Sample 1 ( n = 3001) was considered to be appropriate for factor analysis, because the KMO value was 0.96 (close to 1) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was also highly significant (χ 2 = 23744.39, df = 91, and p < 0.001).

Crucially, the effect of latent profiles remained highly significant after covariate adjustment, F (3,221) = 31.02, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.296.

The primary effect of time was highly significant ( F = 509.072, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.924), indicating a consistent reduction in depression severity across all groups over time.

Specifically, it demonstrated the largest and most highly significant positive predictive effect on both Social Responsibility ( β = 0.344, p < 0.001 ) and Prosocial Behavior ( β = 0.271, p < 0.001 ).

SCAT-A scores also showed a significant trend toward lower scores with longer years of competition [the shortest group: 20.5 (4.2), the longest group: 18.5 (4.3), p < 0.001 for trend].

The statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences with moderate to strong effect sizes on the multivariate level [ F (6,214) = 7.05, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.17], on the univariate level for the PTSD severity [ F (3,108) = 5.88, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.14] and for the sum score of the regularly experienced violence [ F (3,108) = 14.09, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.28].

These showed moderate to strong, highly significant correlations [ r (43) = 0.48 − 0.69, p ≤ 0.001].

The most substantial change was observed in the emotion regulation domain, with all items showing highly significant improvement ( p < 0.001), reflecting the AR intervention’s emphasis on emotional engagement and interactive responsiveness.

In particular, all aspects of achievement motivation exhibit highly significant gender differences ( p < 0.001), with a moderate impact size.

The ANOVA yielded a highly significant result, F (2, 114) = 50.66, p < 0.001, indicating that the magnitude of change in authenticity perceptions varied substantially by source.

For smartphone addiction, the S–W test was non-significant ( p = 0.090), but the K–S test showed marginal significance ( p < 0.001).

As demonstrated in Table 2 , there is a high and highly significant correlation between age and seniority ( p < 0.001), indicating a robust positive association.

Even though the frequency of the expressions in this category is more similar that in the rest of the categories, a Chi 2 test suggests that the difference is highly significant (χ 2 = 763,1422717; p < 0.001).

Vote was highly significant and had a large effect on perceived trustworthiness, F (2, 203) = 113.045, p < 0.001, ηρ 2 = 0.527.

Follow up analyses that analyzed each extraction type separately showed that the trilinguals' L1 Cantonese subject RC scores positively predicted their L3 Mandarin subject RC scores and the result was highly significant (β = 0.78, t = 5.81, p < 0.001), while the trilinguals' Cantonese object RC scores did not predict their Mandarin object RC scores (β = 0.32, t = 1.54, p = 0.14, n.s .).

Additionally, a two-way interaction between ownership and valence (stock outcome) approached significance, F (1, 21) = 13.68, p = 0.001, η 2 partial = 0.394, suggesting that the gain–loss effect was inconsistent between the two different owners (self, other).

We observed a highly significant main effect of semantic relatedness {semantically related > semantically unrelated; [ F (1,46) = 49.122, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.516]}, suggesting a reducing effect of semantic primes on N400 amplitude.

There are two important differences between the two groups regarding the prediction model of ED: the model explains the higher ED variance in psoriasis patients (35%) when compared to healthy persons (19%), and the contribution of expressive suppression is moderately significant in healthy persons ( p < 0.05), and quite significant in psoriasis patients ( p < 0.001) ( Table 7 ).

The SART mean RT and errors of commission The mean RT had a highly significant effect on EoC [ F (1, 111.55) = 50.03, p < 0.001].

For example, for the 14 ability domains used in the College Board survey, Kruger (1999) found a highly significant relationship between domain difficulty and the percentage of participants rating themselves as better than average in that domain, r = -0.81, p < 0.001.

In the left hand columns of Table 3 representing the results for squeals, vocants, and growls the odds ratios show that the three protophones conformed to the first two predictions (protophones > cry in neutrality, protophones < cry in negativity) with highly significant odds ratios (ORs > 1 and p < 0.001).

Significant reductions were observed in the RFB group ( p < 0.05) and the MT group ( p < 0.01), while the CT group showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001).

A one-way ANOVA performed on the mean emotion identification times with repeated measures of emotion type ( anger, disgust, fear , happiness , sadness and neutral ) revealed a highly significant effect of emotion [ F (5, 190) = 113.68; p < 0.001].

All differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001).