Excerpts

The manipulated relevance had only a marginally significant effect on perceived utility in the “public transport story” and no significant effect in the “compulsory vaccination story,” both t s ≤ 1.657, p s ≥ 0.098, d s ≤ 0.135.

Furthermore, it has to be noted that men did not generate a temporal distortion effect in Experiment 1 but overestimated the durations of emotional words for each condition presented in Experiment 2, despite the two conditions being marginally significant (negative high-arousal and positive low-arousal).

The analysis revealed a highly significant effect for the session variable only.

For the dependent variable poeticity , lexical arousal appears as a highly significant predictor variable if its absolute values are considered: The more deviant the lexical arousal values are from zero, no matter whether into a higher arousing or more calming direction, the less poetic the poem is rated (Figures 8A,B ).

The interaction of frame and L+ also showed a marginal significance, which indicates that the influence of L+ stimulation was significant in the gain frame.

(2003) , the authors explained the existence of such an increasing trend of difficulty on the basis of the Cognitive Pragmatic theory ( Bara, 2010 ) and the increasing complexity of the inferential processes involved in the various pragmatic tasks investigated.

The interaction in the second step was of marginal significance.

( 2015 ), we did not observe a similar impact for the teacher WM rating, nor for the parent rating of WM, although the latter measure was borderline significant.

hearing results were close to significance at most eccentricities.

Bivariate correlation of this baseline openness measure with the openness scale of the German BFI version was highly significant and very satisfactory ( r = 0.64).

We first note that with the exception of a nearly significant positive effect of sunshine on valence, the results showed no significant main effects of season and weather on mood before the commute.

Taking each species separately, dogs showed a decrease in the frequency of stress signals from 6 to 8 weeks of age, whereas wolves showed a trend in the opposite direction, with more stress signals being exhibited at 8 weeks than 6 weeks of age (Figure 5 ).

The SCL during p2 was not significantly lower than during p1; however, this difference was marginally significant ( α = 0.10).

Moreover, although this group showed a slight trend toward forgetting the entire List 1, this effect was not reliable indicating that under this more difficult condition participants were not able to use the mechanism that entitle them to forget.

( 2009 ) study investigating the impact of CRI indicated that participants reported fewer PTS symptoms than the TAU group; with a borderline significant difference between the two groups.

With this step, we expect to have a clearly significant model since previous research supports the idea that some demographic aspects (e.g., marital status, or education or socioeconomic status) have a positive influence on the emotional well-being of individuals ( Kahneman and Deaton, 2010 ).

The results showed a marginally significant effect of IMC performance, M PASSED_IMC = 1.58 vs.

A clear trend is that children with ASD show finiteness performance below their chronological age level, just like children with SLI.

On the strong cue condition, the differences almost reached statistical significance: ASD vs.

Sinharay and Haberman (2014) studied practical significance of model misfit with various empirical data sets and concluded that the misfit was not always practically significant though evidence of misfit for a substantial number of items was demonstrated.

While confirming automatic thoughts as a predictor of depression following the family maltreatment, it is fairly significant to alter migrant children's cognition of interpreting their experience as well as reducing their exposure to maltreatment, particular for the vulnerable migrant children with ODD symptoms.

However, there was a statistical trend in the Condition × Trial Type interaction with the BO-Condition showing a somewhat larger difference between regular and deviant trials than the RO-Condition, particularly in the last three training blocks.

This effect could not be attributed to specific differences between single blocks by post-hoc tests, though there seemed to be a numerical trend for participants making slightly more errors in the middle of the experiment (lowest mean error rate: Block 1 = 5.7%, highest mean error rate: Block 3 = 7.7%, Block 6 = 6.8%).

Additionally, the analysis of a genetic overlap between pathological gambling and alcohol dependence revealed, by polygenic risk score analysis of the alcohol dependence dataset, a one-sided nominally significant P -value in individuals with pathological gambling.

From a perceptual point of view, the fact that different regions of the MPS are more or less significant for the identification of different instruments suggests that these regions are specific to the timbre of these instruments.