Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

To more clearly explain the moderating effect of resilience, a simple slope analysis test was conducted by dividing resilience into two groups: low group (M−1SD) and high group (M+1SD), and as shown in the Figure 3 , the positive predictive effect of negative emotions on suicide risk was significant when resilience levels were low (bsimple = 0.40, t = 9.86, p < 0 .001); at higher levels of resilience, the negative emotions had a weaker predictive effect on suicide risk although they also had a positive predictive effect (bsimple = 0.20, t = 4.51, p < 0.01), indicating a decreasing trend in the predictive effect of negative emotions on suicide risk as individuals' level of resilience increased.
Disentangling this latter interaction further, we found that it was due to near-significant differences at fronto-central locations between the familiar and novel stimuli before training, showing larger amplitude for the familiar items [F(1,10) = 4.2, p = 0.068, R 2 = 0.296], whereas after the training the amplitude for the novel items increased and this difference was obliterated [F(1,10) = 0.60, p = 0.811].
Results Our results supported our hypotheses regarding (1) the association of time in nature with affect, (2) the association of time in nature with rumination, and (3) the mediation of the association of time in nature with negative affect through rumination, while the association of time in nature with positive affect through rumination was marginally significant.