Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

Regarding perceptions of future career relevance to AI, those who saw a connection ( M = 3.357, SD = 0.688) had slightly higher AI anxiety than those who did not ( M = 3.233, SD = 0.682), but this difference was not statistically significant ( t = −1.791, p = 0.075), showing only a marginal trend. 4.5.
Although ASQE is frequently used in research on the quality of life in strabismus, of which limitations include being applicable only to children aged 6–12, failing to fully cover infants and older children and adolescents, especially for intermittent exotropia, it is not specifically targeting and may be significant sensitivity (false positives) in the assessment ( Felius et al., 2007 ; Glasman et al., 2013 ; Hatt et al., 2019 ; Leske et al., 2021 ; Wang et al., 2014 ).
The model of meta-regression identified the type of intervention (Qb = 14.82, df = 2, p < 0.001), its duration (Qb = 19.34, df = 2, p < 0.001), and cultural background (Qb = 11.67, df = 2, p = 0.003) as notable moderators, whereas academic discipline (Qb = 5.28, df = 2, p = 0.071) and grade level (Qb = 4.93, df = 2, p = 0.085) exhibited marginally significant moderating impacts, aligning with contemporary meta-analytic results regarding the contextual dependency of educational interventions within higher education environments ( Dunst et al., 2020 ).
One-tailed paired t-tests to test preregistered hypotheses showed a significantly greater arousal level for the asynchronous than the synchronous condition for the third person perspective [t(41) = −2.21, p- uncorrected = 0.016, d = −0.34], but only a trend toward significance for the first-person perspective [t(41) = −1.54, p- uncorrected = 0.066, d = −0.24].
The interaction of age and type of task was only marginally significant (with means of 2,074, 985, and 950 ms in young and 2,507, 1,472, and 1,565 ms in old for ventral, mixed, and dorsal tasks respectively), F (2, 124) = 2.56, p = 0.08. 3.16.3 Imagery error rates Old participants made overall more errors than the young (with means of 18% and of 15%, respectively), F (1, 62) = 7.29, p = 0.009.
highly significantqualifiedgold
However, a main effect of emotional expression ( F (2,32) = 82.94, p < 0.0001) and interaction between the factors Gender × Emotional expression ( F (2,32) = 6.23, p < 0.003) were highly significant.
Gender affects body language reading.
Front Psychol · 2011 · PMC3111255