Excerpts

Stability was defined as an absence of a decreasing trend of at least two consecutive data-points prior to introduction of treatment.

However, the descriptive difference between the conditions regarding the perceived difficulty showed a trend in the predicted direction but missed statistical significance.

H2 received some support since performance-approach goal orientation was associated with power values in Studies 1 and 2 but only a marginally significant correlation was found in Study 3.

Table 3 displays that specific items of locomotor and object control skills did not increase in the control group after the experimental period, while a highly significant increase was observed in all the items in IG in response to PEP.

Results: Data indicated a significant influence of age on the accuracy score and execution time variables and a marginally significant effect of education on the accuracy score variable.

While overall accuracy was poorer than for indoor scenes [ t (59) = 5.725, p < 0.001], the main effects and interaction remained highly significant.

Conclusion Currently, the AS perception of Chinese LTRs is at an average level, showing an overall trend of SAS < EAS < WAS < GAS < MAS in terms of specific social assistance dimensions.

In Figure 6 , LTRs' WAS is distributed relatively evenly among the four groups, without showing an obvious trend of concentration.

No other variables were significantly related to performance on the loss of control task, although there was a marginally significant negative association between the pursuit rotor task and RTs to loss of control, r s = -0.304, suggesting that participants with better hand-eye coordination may respond faster to loss of control.

The results show a strong and highly significant correlation between on-the-job creativity and innovation.

In fact, he had the larger aim in his work of socially contextualizing human cognitive research more broadly than just navigation, but he chose navigation as his main test case (which may be significant in and of itself).

Due to this, any noticeable difference seen in the following simulations can be assumed to be a highly significant difference across conditions.

However, due to the slightly smaller sample size, this small-to-medium correlation was only marginally significant in Experiment 2.

The results showed a positive trend in most of the investigated players in assists (91% of cases) and free throw percentages (73% of cases).

In the post hoc paired t -tests, all the four comparisons were highly significant by both subjects and items.

In terms of the correlation between implicit and explicit attitudes, there was a negative trend among the participants residing in Tokyo, although this was not supported by any statistical evidence.

Although the manipulation of difficulty level was only marginally significant, there was a possibility that the facilitation in the hard task was so immense that it reached the performance in the easy task.

Interestingly, however, the activity of the OO muscle showed a trend in the interaction between gender of the observer and perspective taking: when the imagine-self perspective was adopted, OO muscle activity was stronger in women than in men.

One should consider, however, that although we did not observe a main effect of perspective taking (as Lamm et al., 2008 ), the interaction between the gender of the observer and perspective taking was close to significance for the activity of the OO muscle.

Using group as moderator variable only resulted in a small and not quite significant increase of the model fit.

There is a small trend for larger differences between numbers/letters in position mapping for symbols at the top of the item list.

Following this evidence, we expected a moderate increase in cortisol during the training scenario to predict better performance, but here we found a nonsignificant trend for decrease in this sample.

PW: F (1, 38) = 5.6, p = 0.023, partial-ƞ 2 = 0.13) and by the nearly significant interaction between Stimulus and Task (HFW vs.

And the representation pattern of low-level group is similar to that of the general group, but there is significant difference between each two of four sets of scores (one marginally significant).

Again, the unproductive team lacks such a clear trend.