Excerpts

When decade of music was included in the analysis, a linear contrast found a quite significant decreasing effect of birth cohort [ F (1,54) = 10.9, p = 0.0017] on how much they were listening to music alone.

The difference between N400s elicited by English scientific metaphors and conventional metaphors was marginally significant at the left and middle parietal regions [P3: t (16) = −1.79, p = 0.091; Pz: t (16) = −1.90, p = 0.076], significant at the right frontal and central regions [F4: t (16) = −3.33, p = 0.004; C4: t (16) = −3.50, p = 0.003], and highly significant at the right parietal region [P4: t (16) = −3.65, p = 0.002].

Crucially, the interaction of congruency and task was highly significant, F (1, 46) = 10.80, p = 0.002.

By contrast, the main effect on feature-based inter-trial effects was statistically highly significant, F (7,116) = 3.6, p = 0.002.

For negative press factors, after controlling for all moderator variables, the difference between MCT and MCBS remained highly significant, B = 0.647, SE = 0.210, z = 3.083, p = 0.002, k = 65.

Mentalizing categories The effect of mentalizing category was highly significant, F (2, 350) = 6.54, p = 0.002.

As can be seen in Table 4 , the association between RST and the collapsed SRT 70 is highly significant ( p = 0.002), while the association between the collapsed CSC and SRT 70 is not ( p = 0.30).

This between-group difference was highly significant ( p = 0.002) ( Table 2 and Figure 2 ).

In fact, the rating differences for NH children's happy and sad utterances were highly significant, t (14) = −3.81, p = 0.002, and the same trend was evident for child CI, t (14) = −1.96, p = 0.07.

The predictor Threat (β = 0.278, p = 0.149) and familiarity (β = -0.287, p = 0.114) were not significant, however, the interaction term threat × familiarity was highly significant (β = -0.613, p = 0.002).

Differences between means and grand means in concentration approached significance for mental preparation, t (6) = 5.5, p = 0.002, and technique, t (9) = 4.49, p = 0.002.

When examined separately (Figure 2B , gray curves), the effect of depressiveness scores was not significant in scrambled sentences on separation and loss ( z = −1.07, p = 0.14, one-tailed) but highly significant in the optimism set ( z = −2.96, p = 0.002, one-tailed).

In the sub-sample of 17 No-SCD participants that were matched to the SCD group, the difference in FRN amplitude between positive and negative feedback was still highly significant, t (16) = 3.80, p = 0.002, d = 0.92.

The other three articles ( Jia et al., 2023 ; Jie et al., 2014 ; Liu et al., 2020 ) used the CFS, which had a large and highly significant effect size (SMD = -0.98, 95% CI: -1.63 ∼ -0.32, p = 0.003) ( Jia et al., 2023 ; Jie et al., 2014 ; Liu et al., 2020 ).

This was confirmed with a one-way ANCOVA comparing standard scores of verbal ability between children who do and do not report playing a musical instrument, with age, sex, SES, and VO 2 max as covariates: the effect of playing an instrument was highly significant [ F (1, 94) = 9.10, p = 0.003, partial η 2 = 0.091].

In the model H3, Psychological Safety (PSA) was equally highly significant in impacting Employee Engagement (EEN) ( β = 0.138, p = 0.003).

Crucially, the interaction was highly significant [ F 1 (1, 10) = 15.63, MSE = 0.065, p < 0.003; F 2 (1, 30) = 9.28, MSE = 0.075, p < 0.005] 7 .

A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed this difference to be highly significant ( p < 0.003).

The interaction between Emotion and Question was marginally significant [ F 1 (2,118) = 6.41, p < 0.003, η 2 = 0.01; F 2 (2,36) = 1.82, p < 0.18, η 2 = 0.01], as the effect of Emotion type was largest for the innateness question Δ = 1.37 (for the face and body questions, Δ = 1.08 and Δ = 0.89, respectively).

There was a positive correlation between updating errors and cognitive confidence at borderline significance level [ r (297) = 0.17, R 2 = 0.03, p = 0.003].

BMI Z-scores decreased steadily from approximately 0.5 at lower levels of teacher support to around 0.1 at higher levels, representing a reduction of about 0.4 standard deviation units, with a highly significant linear trend ( P = 0.003).

The group-by-age interaction was highly significant ( p = 0.003), altogether suggesting less age-related gray matter decline in meditators than in controls.

In contrast, analyses on the subset of older bilingual children showed a highly significant speed-accuracy trade-off for global performance ( r 29 = 0.53, p = 0.003), and for incongruent ( r 29 = 0.49, p = 0.007) but not congruent trials ( r 29 = 0.15, p = 0.435).

Even though such a decrease is considered significant in some recommendations (Tabachnick and Fidell, 2001 ), the loading was still highly significant ( p = 0.004), with the pattern being in accordance with the discriminant validity phenomenon described in the PwMS sample.

Pairwise comparisons show that the difference between onlookers and participants is highly significant in the train scenario, χ 2 (1, 400) = 8.51, p = 0.004, φ c = 0.146, and the large game show scenario, χ 2 (1, 419) = 6.33, p = 0.012, φ c = 0.123, but narrowly failed to reach conventional levels of significance in the small game show scenario: χ 2 (1, 365) = 3.38, p = 0.066, φ c = 0.096.