Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

The univariate models linking these variables as well as the multivariate models for H = f(K, d′) were not even remotely close to achieving significance for the relevant parameters (with the exception of power-law scaling between K − and β, discussed earlier), and we therefore limit our discussion here to the q-values observed for the H = f(K, β) models.
Epidemiological data from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Global Burden of Disease Study indicate an important trend: although age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of stroke have shown a moderate decline, the absolute number of stroke cases among older adults worldwide has increased markedly because of the rapid growth of the aging population ( Torres-Roman et al., 2025 ).
Finite constructions There was a main effect of correctness approaching significance at the first ROI, and significant at the second and third ROIs [first ROI: F 1(1,37) = 3.489; p = 0.07; F 2(1,9) = 4.257; p = 0.046; Second ROI: F 1(1,37) = 32.093; p < 0.001; F 2(1,9) = 27.5; p < 0.001; Third ROI: F 1(1,37) = 13.208; p < 0.001; F 2(1,9) = 7.121; p = 0.001].
In addition, all main effects were more pronounced in old participants: they had stronger performance decrements in cognitive dual tasks compared to single tasks [difference between dual tasks and single tasks: old: M = 0.33; SE = 0.05; young: M = 0.09; SE = 0.02; difference between age groups: t (19) = 4.01, p < 0.001, d = 1.75], for modality incompatible compared to modality compatible tasks [difference between modality incompatible and modality compatible tasks; old: M = 0.21; SE = 0.02; young: M = 0.05; SE = 0.02; difference between age groups: t (19) = 4.93, p < 0.001, d = 2.15] and marginally significant higher decrements during standing compared to sitting [difference between standing and sitting: old: M = 0.07; SE = 0.02; young: M = 0.03; SE = 0.02; difference between age groups: t (19) = 1.87, p = 0.077, d = 0.82].