Excerpts

This model explains 10.9% of the variance of proportion of dwell time and is marginally significant [ F (2, 53) = 3.10, p =.053; see Table 3 ].

For RT, the results showed that the main effect of familiarity between the familiar condition and the novel condition [ F (1,34) = 17.30, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.37] was significant, and the main effect of appropriateness between the appropriate condition and the inappropriate condition was marginally significant [ F (1,34) = 4.02, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.11].

The Parallel task showed a trend toward a significant difference [ F (1,65) = 3.883, p = 0.053, partial η 2 = 0.056].

The group effect was marginally significant [ F (1,53) = 3.914, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.069], indicating that the disengaging of AVGPs was more efficient than that of NAVGPs.

However, although approaching significance, there was no significant effect of PBF on percent VO 2 max at crossover point during the SGET ( P = 0.053).

Subjective Quality of Life Supporting H1c, analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of pre-retirement multiple identities at Step 1 (β = 0.16, p = 0.053) that explained 2% of the total variance.

The interaction Visual Field × Hand arrangement was not significant: F (1, 26) = 1.121, p = 0.229, while, the Hand × Hand Arrangement interaction was marginally significant F (1, 26) = 4.116, p = 0.053 with the right hand slightly faster (254 ms) than the left hand (261 ms) with the inverted, but not with the anatomical arrangement (left hand = 267 vs. right hand = 268 ms).

Results In total, 1 year after the mindset induction, students originally assigned at random to the Develop condition reported on average greater intentions to use cultivation strategies when their passion was low ( M = 27.61, SD = 3.75), compared to those in the Fit condition—a marginally significant effect ( M = 25.57, SD = 4.74), b = 2.04, [0.02, 4.11], t (68) = 1.97, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.48.

For the MBSR group, Δlow-beta power in resting 1 for the Pz site was found to have a negative correlation with ΔDERS ( b =−0.50, p =0.040), Δtheta in breathing for the Pz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.48, p =0.053), Δlow-beta in body-scan for the Fz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.48, p =0.054), Δalpha in resting 2 for both Fz ( b =−0.64, p =0.006) and Pz sites ( b =−0.51, p =0.036) showed a negative correlation with ΔFFMQ, and Δtheta in resting 2 for the Pz site had a marginally significant negative correlation with ΔFFMQ ( b =−0.47, p =0.058).

The difference over time between the three treatment arms for the alerting network approached significance [ F (4,133) = 2.40, p = 0.053].

These analyses showed a trend for lower the tree hierarchy in dyslexics compared to typical readers during task [ F (1, 53) = 3.92, p = 0.053] but not in the baseline p = 0.544.

For upright houses, the Similarity × Age interaction was significant, F (4,118) = 9.0, p = 0.0001, but the simple effect of similarity was only marginally significant for older children ( p = 0.053, no linear trend) and not significant for adults or younger children.

A chi-square analysis was performed and the effect was marginally significant, indicating increased forgetting over time [χ 2 (1) = 3.75, p = 0.053; Cramer’s φ = 0.31].

However, there was a positive correlation with openness ( r = 0.532, p = 0.041) and a near-significant correlation with conscientiousness ( r = -0.509, p = 0.053).

The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of sibling status with a moderate effect size ( F (2, 56) = 3.09, p = 0.053, ηp 2 = 0.10, 95% CI [0.00, 1.00]), which indicated a potential difference between at least two groups.

Paired samples t -tests revealed that the discrimination effect was only significant in the LF region [ t (19) = 3.49, p = 0.002], and marginally significant in the RF region [ t (19) = 2.07, p = 0.053].

There was a marginally significant difference between the stimulus groups ( f (2,84) = 3.04, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.068).

A total of 91% of patients without comorbid disorders were in remission at follow-up compared to 58.3% for patients with comorbidity (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.12), and the difference in Y-BOCS (Comorbidity: M = 11.45, SD = 7.03, No-Comorbidity: M = 7.74, SD = 4.83) was nearly significant, t (33) = 2.01, p = 0.053.

A main effect of Target Content Consistency approached significance, F (1, 135) = 3.815, p = 0.053, MSE = 858.22, ηp 2 = 0.027, with trials on which the target content was consistent with the observer’s mental representation generating numerically lower RTs than trials on which the target content representation diverged across the observer and the cue.

Planned comparisons indicated that the difference in P e amplitude between errors and correct responses at Fcz was marginally significant in adults, F (1,46) = 3.94, p = 0.053, older children, F (1,46) = 3.06, p = 0.087, and younger children, F (1,46) = 3.25, p = 0.078 groups, but not in the medium children group, p > 0.1.

Only in the case of Hungary in the 40th–60th percentile split, we did not find a significant difference, and in the 60th–40th percentile split, the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

The group main effect approached significance ( F (1,39) = 4.0, p = 0.053) with a tendency for children with dyslexia to make more errors (15.6%) than control readers (10.9%).

The distribution of AU 17 was marginally significant across platforms/versions, H (5) = 10.932, p = 0.053.

5 After including the covariates age, nationality, personal experience with COVID-19 and country of residence this result was marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

For free browsing, the main effect of the reading-goals variable was marginally statistically significant [ F (1, 44) = 3.94, MSE = 79.37, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.08].