Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

approached significancep = 0.0541.1× alpha
Intercepts for anxiety and depression approached significance ( p = 0.054 and p = 0.089, respectively), with mild asymmetry suggesting that smaller studies with null or unfavorable results may be under-represented, a pattern also noted in several recent music intervention meta-analyses.
a statistical trendp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
More utterances produced on strategies of coping with the illness were linked to poorer executive functioning (WCST Percentage of Errors, Rho = 0.975, and p = 0.005; Percentage of Conceptual Answers, Rho = −0.975, and p = 0.005; and a statistical trend on Percentage of Perseveration Errors, Rho = 0.872, and p = 0.054), as well as lower memory and verbal learning (CVLT Free Recall Short Delay, Rho = −0.921, and p = 0.026; and a statistical trend on Free Recall Long Delay, Rho = −0.872, and p = 0.054).
only marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
In Sample 2, this relationship was only marginally significant (β = −0.117, p = 0.054) after taking into account the effects of age, gender, and previous mental health help-seeking. 4 Discussion This study is the first to examine the psychosocial and mental health correlations of perceived teacher support after taking into account the effects of childhood trauma in a cross-cultural context.
marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
The post-hoc multiple comparisons (Bonferroni-corrected) revealed a marginally significant difference between the four- and five-year-old children on ANS accuracy (95% Confidence Interval [−21.06, 0.14], p = 0.054), but the difference between the four- and six-year-old group was not significant (95% CI [−17.92, 2.76], p = 0.221).
It is worth noting that post-HABIT internalized shame score came very close to being statistically significant (post-HABIT Perceived Stigma Internalized Shame score is not a significant predictor of post-HABIT Perceived Stress, B = 0.1.072[−0.019, 2.163], t = 2.012, p = 0.054).
marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
We found a significant main effect for condition [ F (2, 18) = 20.1, p = 0.0001, ή 2 = 0.7], a marginally significant effect for Type [ F (1, 19) = 4.226, p = 0.054, ή 2 = 0.18] and a significant interaction of Type and Condition [ F (2, 18) = 14.624, p < 0.0001, ή 2 = 0.6].
Prosody in the hands of the speaker.
Front Psychol · 2014 · PMC4083345