Critically, the four-way (Condition × Space × Distance × Experiment) interaction approached significance [ F (10,165) = 1.78, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.10], suggesting that the different types of training induced specific effects on PPS representation.
We then proceeded to analyze the reports from the analog rating scale (Figure 2 ) and found a marginally significant difference in pleasure between the three priming conditions [ F (2, 27) = 3.175, p = 0.058], Group 1 scoring the highest ( M = 7.2, SD = 1.55) and Group 3 the lowest ( M = 5.7, SD = 1.34).
With outliers included in the model it is only marginally significant ( p = 0.058; in all others cases * p <0.05). seq_cross and HSTC, word group based metrics, are the best performing models according to their BIC/AIC, with HSTC coming out on top.
The three-way interaction almost reached significance [ F (1,37) = 3.8, p = 0.058].
However, workplace vigor, defined as “high levels of energy and resilience, the willingness to invest effort, not being easily fatigued, and persistence in the face of difficulties,” approached significance at p = 0.058 ( Schaufeli et al., 2006 ).
The interaction of “time” × “group,” however, was not significant and showed only a trend toward significance [ F (1,28) = 3.92, p = 0.058].
The interaction effect of POLARITY_MAIN × POLARITY_SUB was marginally significant [see Figure 2 ; F (1,16) = 4.16, p = 0.058].
The results showed a trend whereby the infants that looked more to target words at utterance-edge position than to unfamiliar words [ r (32) = 0.33, p = 0.058] and that looked more at target words at utterance-medial position than to unfamiliar words [ r (32) = 0.33, p = 0.052] have larger later expressive vocabulary outcomes measured with the CDI percentile.
This association was marginally significant in Model_3b ( β = −0.13, p = 0.058).
Planned paired t -tests between targets surrounded by fearful flanker faces compared to all other flankers (average) were significant for emotion recognition accuracy ( t (28) = 2.18, p = 0.038) and revealed a statistical trend for reaction time ( t (28) = 1.98, p = 0.058) ( Figure 5 ).
Although there was only a marginally significant interaction between age group and gender, F (1,153) = 3.66, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.02, tests of simple effects indicate that gender differences in donating are significant for 4-year-olds only ( Table 2 ).
We observed a strong significant positive correlation between Reduced Mind-wandering and Silence (components of the Silencing category) ( r = 0.72, p < 0.001), a significant negative correlation between Attentional Effort and Reduced Mind-wandering ( r = −0.49, p < 0.05), and a correlation that approached significance between Attentional Effort and Silence ( r = -0.40, p = 0.058) ( Figure 3B ).
The interaction term of training support approached significance, β = −0.112, SE = 0.059, T = −1.898, p = 0.058.
Also, the main effect of attentional focus was marginally significant, F (1, 44) = 3.80, p = 0.058.
This difference bordered on significance [ F (1, 93) = 3.699, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.038].
For when the case type was guilty, for judges there was an effect of rating [ F (2, 64.3) = 3.503, p = 0.036], but no evidence for a CF, rather a situation where Prob ( B ) > Prob ( A&B ) (M ProbB = 9.543, SE ProbB = 0.250; M ProbA&B = 8.831, SE ProbA&B = 0.276, marginally approaching significance, p = 0.058, d = 0.612) (Taylor, 2015 ).
The main effect of emotion conditions was marginally significant [ F (1.407, 21.100) = 3.616, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.194], but the main effect of time points and the interaction were all not significant.
However, note this association was only marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.058).
In a similar vein, two-sample t -tests between 6-year-old TD and 8-year-old ASD children showed a marginally significant effect for saccades between the target and the relational location, t (43.74) = 1.95, p = 0.058, but no effects for saccades between the target and the non-relational location, t (44) = 0.82, p = 0.419.
However, we observed an increasing trend of average fixation rate from C2 to C3 ( Z = 1.88, p = 0.058).
The effect of distractor location was marginally significant, F (2,28) = 3.89, MSE = 1682, p = 0.0583, η p 2 = 0.12, showing larger interference at the repeated location (14 ms) as compared to the non-repeated location (2 ms).
We found a trend toward significance for the main effect of the congruency of the priming [ t (850.76) = −1.894, p = 0.0586].
Interestingly, we also observe marginally significant associations between pathogen disgust sensitivity and those with whom the respondents have closer ties—that is, people they know personally ( b = −0.06, p = 0.059 (M3))—and even friends ( b = −0.06, p = 0.063 (M2)).
The results for males showed that the sensitivity of the Flanker Task to detect any differences between students with and without disabilities for the RT measure revealed a trend approaching significance for an effect of Disability [ F (1) = 4.142, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.206].
Compared to the no-contrast condition, the increase triggered by the object contrast was only marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.6, df = 1, n = 76, p = 0.059), whereas the decrease triggered by the liquid contrast was significant (χ 2 = 37.2, df = 1, n = 73, p < 0.001).