Excerpts

The age differences during post-test were marginally significant [χ 2 (2, N = 342) = 5.63, p = 0.06, Cramer’s V = 0.13], indicating, in line with this latter finding, that the adults tended to choose the teacher less often than did the 7- and 10-year-olds.

Specifically, Yu and Shek ( 2013 ) reported that better family functioning characterized by better family mutuality, less conflicts and more communication among family members predicted a lower level of Chinese adolescents' IA 2 years later with the marginally significant effect (i.e., p = 0.06).

A marginally significant interaction of the newly introduced factor Window (80 vs. 120 ms) with Stimulus type [ F (1,15) = 4.03, p = 0.06] suggested an earlier peak for the word than pseudo-word stimuli (also visible in the ERP patterns).

Higher maternal education had a marginally significant association with lower AOSI scores [ t (37) = −1.97, p = 0.06].

The interaction between delay interval, age, and educational track showed a trend toward significance [Greenhouse–Geisser F (1.77,1098.32) = 2.34, p = 0.06].

An LSD post-hoc test indicated that the percentage of retrieval was almost significantly higher at the first compared to the third session ( p = 0.06).

In L2 learners, follow-up analyses revealed that the effect of grammaticality was only marginally significant in the singular attractor condition ( p = 0.060, d = 0.62), but this effect was absent in the plural attractor condition ( p = 0.840, d = 0.05).

Both the pitch frequency and participant factors approached significance: Pitch frequency F ( 3 , 24 ) = 2 . 77 , p = 0 . 06 , η 2 = 0 . 13 ; Participant F ( 2 , 24 ) = 3 . 17 , p = 0 . 06 , η 2 = 0 . 10 , for the vowel /a/.

Faculty ratings varied at a marginal significance level according to experimental group ( F = 2.89, p < 0.06).

4 , 5 , 6 Importantly, there was a marginally significant three-way interaction between veracity, being forewarned, and time, b = –0.001, F (1,154.001) = 3.598, p = 0.060, and, also a marginally significant interaction between veracity and being forewarned, b = –0.165, F (1,153.534) = 3.461, p = 0.065 (see Figure 1 ).

Sixteen year-olds performed better than the12-year-olds (mean differences = 2.50, 95% CI [0.32, 4.69], p < 0.05), yet 15 year-olds showed a trend of outperforming the 12-year-olds (mean differences = 2.27, 95% CI [−0.050, 4.58], p = 0.06).

While the main effect of Part-Whole Condition was only marginally significant, F (1,37) = 3.75, MSE = 161151.68, p = 0.060, there was a significant Orientation by Part-Whole Condition interaction, F (1,37) = 30.71, MSE = 112415.92, p < 0.001.

However, for conventional affective arousal index Aff(Ar.c) , the session × group interaction was marginally significant ( F (1, 36) = 3.77, p = 0.060, η p 2 = 0.10).

A similar regression predicting intention to drink coffee revealed a marginal trend for the main effect of condition (β = -0.16, t = -1.91, p = 0.06, r p = -0.16) with participants in the experimental condition reporting less desire for coffee, no significant effect of sensation seeking (β = 0.02, t = 0.21, p = 0.83, r p = 0.02) and no significant interaction (β = -0.02, t = -0.22, p = 0.83, r p = -0.02).

Planned comparisons indicated a significant difference between the 800 and 1100 ms intervals, F (1, 30) = 33.67, p < 0.001, whereas the difference between 1100 and 1400 ms intervals was marginally significant, F (1, 30) = 3.61, p = 0.06.

The relationship between Raven’s performance and total sleep (SDSC) score approached significance, r s (46) = 0.28, p = 0.06.

Compared with the neutral PA, PA with emotional feedback led to higher intrinsic motivation (marginally significant) [ F (1, 107) = 3.72, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.034].

On the contrary, visual function had only a nearly significant effect on age-normalized MC span [ F (2,41 = 4.36, adj. p = 0.06].

Meanwhile, middle-to-higher-income Latino(a) parents, in comparison with White parents, reported significantly more changes in appreciation of life (95% CI Mdifference [0.16, 1.25], p < 0.01), improved relationships (95% CI Mdifference [0.16, 1.13], p < 0.01), and new possibilities (95% CI Mdifference [0.15, 1.16], p < 0.01), as well as more changes in personal strength that was approaching significance (95% CI Mdifference [−0.02, 1.12], p = 0.06).

While the trends indicated that all aspects of self-esteem followed the same general pattern (i.e., synchronous > asynchronous), only the appearance subscale approached significance, t (64) = 2.4, p = 0.06, d = 0.6, 95% CI of mean difference: 0.4, 4.7, suggesting that this aspect may have been driving the overall self-esteem effect more so than the performance, t (64) = 1.4, p = 0.51, 95% CI of mean difference: -0.5, 3.0, or social subscales, t (64) = 1.3, p = 0.60, 95% CI of mean difference: -0.8, 3.7.

On the other hand, the interaction was only marginally significant when limited to the two-flanker and four-flanker conditions, F (1, 8) = 5.04, p = 0.06, and was in the opposite direction.

Spatial ROIs We found a marginally significant interaction in a cluster in right PSPL/Pr, (peak coordinate: x = 20, y = -66, z = 54, BA = 7, z = 2.52, p = 0.06, k = 83 voxels; Figure 4A ) 7 .

The relation of attentional control to reading comprehension was marginally significant (0.19, p = 0.06) after controlling for short-term memory, decoding, vocabulary, and inference.

For the BMI, the difference between the correlation with the ideal-IRAP and the actual-IRAP just missed significance, t (46) = 1.91, p = 0.06.

Scores on the SCPBI-Y (pain burden) approached significance ( p = 0.06).