Excerpts

Noteworthy, this coefficient appeared as negative and marginally significant among boys, with a standardized beta value of β = −0.104, p = 0.069 (unstandardized b = −0.146, p = 0.078). 4.

Moreover, the influence of paranoia on predicting opponent’s fear was marginally significant ( Supplementary Table S5 ; odds ratio=1.23, 95% CI [0.98, 1.54], p =0.069).

The role of the decoding accuracy (Model 2) was marginally significant ( p = 0.069), and the explained variance reached 12.7%.

As expected, we found a marginally significant effect of SVO in Model 1, b = 0.083, t (123) = 1.831, p = 0.069.

A marginally significant main effect for gaining condition (i.e., gain, neutral, and loss) was found (see Figure 2 ) F (2,26) = 2.964, MSE = 3.18, p = 0.069.

The statistical analysis showed that the number of dimensions in the final stepwise DFA was lower in the bilingual model than in the monolingual model, although this was only marginally significant [5.97 < 7.00, t (5) = 2.31, p = 0.069].

7 Furthermore, participants in the WEAK DEFAULT treatment also had a marginally significant higher prevalence of choosing exactly the pro-socially set default amount (= 100 ECU) (11.6% in WEAK DEFAULT vs. 4.6% in NO DEFAULT, z = 3.32, p = 0.069, n 1 = 129, n 2 = 129).

In line with our expectations, we found a marginally significant difference when comparing the banner AOI hit likelihoods for static and animated banner advertisements containing a face, χ 2 (1, N = 108) = 3.315, p = 0.069, showing that animated faces were 2.073 times more likely to direct participants’ attention to the advertisement than static faces.

Type III tests of fixed effects reported significant main effects of SI type ( F (1, 53.474) = 5.22, p = 0.026) and Group ( F (1, 23.916) = 14.079, p < 0.001) with a marginally significant interaction between the two factors ( F (1, 55.579) = 3.439, p = 0.069).

Time Elapse From Equivalence Tests and IRAP Time between equivalence tests and IRAP had a marginally significant effect on the modulation of D-IRAP for trial type 1 [Type 1 right after : Mean = 0.72, SD = 0.35; Type 1 7 days : Mean = 0.58, SD = 0.46; t (133) = 1.83, p = 0.069], as depicted in Figure 4 .

Conversely, the effect of Group showed a trend that did not reach significance [ F (2,109) = 2.7, p = 0.069].

Finally, the three-way interaction between donor’s identifiability, recipients’ identifiability and the number of recipients approached significance F (1, 295) = 3.23, p = 0.069, η p 2 = 0.011.

We observed again an almost significant three-way interaction [ F (1,37) = 3.5, p = 0.069].

Egger’s test approached significance ( p = 0.069).

However, the product of the two path coefficients was only marginally significant ( ab = 0.013, z = 1.81, p = 0.069).

Simple slope analysis results ( Figure 2 ) indicate that for J-N1 learners, there was a significant trend of L2 processing efficiency predicting Chinese lexical processing efficiency ( β = 0.01, se = 0.00, df = 1,006, t = 1.82, p = 0.069), suggesting that higher L2 Japanese lexical processing efficiency was associated with an increased tendency for Chinese lexical processing efficiency.

The analyses only showed a trend for burnout (emotional exhaustion), in the direction of physicians being more exhausted [24.5(8.25–28.5) vs. 7(3.5–9.75); p = 0.069].

The correlation between age and hours spent online was marginally significant ( r = −0.104, p = 0.069).

Though we do found the interaction of action × object was close to significance in the RTs ( p = 0.069).

Interestingly, further analysis revealed that British participants perceived their past selves as being further away than their future selves at a marginally significant level, F (1, 80) = 3.41, p = 0.069, Cohen’s d = 0.407.

There were some almost significant ( p = 0.07–0.08) trends in some of the variables studied: Social awareness improved in the Latvian student sample in both age groups as well as in Slovenian 8–11-year old student sample.

The interaction between the factors was not significant for Opacity, χ 2 (2) = 0.07, p = 0.96, and it approached significance for Oiliness, β Standard = −0.69, SE Standard = 0.32, χ 2 (2) = 5.42, p = 0.07.

The difference between refugee and recently immigrated parents was close to being significant ( t = 1.850, p = 0.070).

Career self-efficacy expectations and academic achievement quadratic trends also demonstrated a negative and statistically marginally significant association, r = −0.09, p = 0.07.

Consumption cost had a marginally significant effect on the number of clips [ F (1,71) = 3.36, p = 0.07]: Participants selected slightly more clips in the low-cost condition ( M = 5.59, SD = 2.84) than in the high-cost condition ( M = 4.47, SD = 2.41).