Similar results were observed in the “true” longitudinal subsample where differences between high- and low-risk women nearly reached significance in the second trimester (adjusted p value = 0.051), with high-risk women reporting more depressive symptoms in the second but not in the first or the third trimester ( Supplementary Materials Table S2 ).
Waist Circumference and Waist to Hip Ratio A significant main effect for time was revealed for waist circumference ( p = 0.022, Table 2 ), with all groups decreasing their waist circumference over the 16 weeks, albeit, only a strong trend was statistically identified for IF/SIT at 16 weeks ( p = 0.051).
Likewise, in the present study, a quasi-significant association was obtained between attending an oral health education workshop and the level of knowledge in prevention ( p = 0.051), despite the fact that only 10% of pregnant women had attended one of the training workshops on oral health care that were offered at the Health Center.
As for physical infrastructure, there was a trend towards significance, with physicians reporting lower adequacy (11% versus 21%, p -value = 0.051). 4.
The bootstrap method indicated that the indirect relationship of fathers’ work engagement with their child’s emotional and behavioral problems was marginally significant for fathers (−0.032; 95% CI between −0.029 and −0.001, p = 0.051) and non-significant for mothers (−0.028; 95% CI between −0.027 and −0.001, p = 0.077).
An almost significant trend towards higher social extraversion as measured by BBS was also detected after subjects slept in the stone pine bed (0.19 vs. −0.19 units, p = 0.051). 3.3.
In the general BC group env positivity in blood was negatively correlated with age considering any group of comparison, and a marked trend towards a negative correlation with LNM (Tau-b = −0.4, p = 0.051) was observed when samples positive for MMTV in blood and tumor were compared with samples that were positive only in tumor tissue ( Table 4 ).
Subsequent analysis of the factors associated with worse QoL showed a significant positive correlation between disease severity and DLQI (Spearman’s Rho = 0.25, p = 0.003) and a nearly significant negative association between severity and MCS (Spearman’s Rho = −0.165, p = 0.051) ( Table 3 ).
There was a significant difference ( Figure 6 A) between ApEn of left and right knee flexion (t(12.49) = −2.68, p = 0.02) with hip flexion close to significance (t(17.88) = −2.10, p = 0.051) in the PD group.
However, light fruits were borderline significant in linear regression ( p = 0.051), we can’t conclude from our findings that there are real differences between light fruits and sleep quality.
The difference in the attendance of religious meetings was marginally significant (t(343) = −1.957, p = 0.051), with women, on average, attending organised religious meetings (ORA) more often than men.
Follow-up tests were non-significant, apart from a marginally significant difference between CARS2 scores at pre- and post-test for the intervention group only ( t (9) = 2.250, p = 0.051, r = 0.6).
Postoperatively (1D), the absolute value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) was greater in the RVP group than in the HBP group ( Table 2 ); however, this difference fell slightly short of significance (16.32 ± 2.57 vs. 14.85 ± 2.52%, p = 0.051).
Lack of PPE training indicated a marginally significant association with increased odds of reporting a SARS-CoV-2 infection (AOR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00–1.58, p = 0.051) compared to those who were trained in using PPE.
The third important finding of this study is that low eGFR was significantly associated with new-onset hypertension in the traditional definition population ( p < 0.001), whereas the association was only borderline significant in the new definition population ( p = 0.051).
A marginally significant effect of Aramchol 600 mg was shown in terms of NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis (16.7% versus 5% in placebo, p = 0.051 OR 4.74, 95% CI 0.99–22.7), while a significant effect on fibrosis improvement without worsening of NASH was not observed.
However, significant differences in GnRH receptor and FSH mRNA expression ( p < 0.05), and near-significant differences in LH expression ( p = 0.0515), were observed in mice exposed to ozone compared to those exposed to filtered air after 4 h ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.