Excerpts

First, the face and body groups reported significantly greater functional impairment and emotional distress compared with the fingerpicking group (although the difference for emotional distress was only marginally significant from those with primarily body picking, p = 0.06).

Borderline significant results appeared for ‘nausea/dizziness’ ( p = 0.06) and ‘irritated eyes’ ( p = 0.09). 3.5.

These associations reached statistical significance in one group (Spearman correlation, rho = –0.234, p = 0.04) and borderline significance in the other (Spearman correlation, rho = –0.199, p = 0.06).

77.7%, p = 0.02), whereas perceived severity was only marginally significant (91.1% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.06).

In our results, the decrease in the prevalence of insufficient PA was close to significance ( p = 0.06), but a clear trend was observed across all countries.

No significant difference was observed in the prevalence of PDM in the participants with different ages, marital statuses, or education levels; a borderline significant difference was observed between genders, with a female predominance ( p = 0.06) ( Table 1 ). 3.2.

The addition of transitivity and the out-degree in models 2 and 3 each approached significance at p < 0.06.

No significant difference was found for reward focus between active and control conditions for EFT-Full Raw [ p = 0.93] Reward focus was higher in active FTP conditions, but only approached significance compared to control [2.16(1.51) vs. 0.96(1.04); p = 0.06].

This association was marginally significant for SHS participants from Arizona ( p = 0.06) and reached statistical significance for SHS participants of the Oklahoma region and NHW males ( p = 0.02 and <0.001, respectively).

In subjects with non-diagnosed HTN, the responder group showed significantly lower DBP, and the proportion of combined triple H condition was borderline significant ( p = 0.06) regarding CV risk ( Table 2 ).

Anxiety was also positively correlated with intent to comply, but this correlation was only marginally significant (b = 0.20, SE = 0.10, p < 0.06).

For each of these outcome measures, no significant effect of the overall time variable was seen for the whole study period, except for a marginally significant decrease in total treatment contacts ( p = 0.06) over time.

The results showed that there was a marginally significant interaction between regulatory focus and emotion in regard to the behavior of water-saving information dissemination ( F (1,56) = 3.62, p = 0.06)).

A logistic regression model ( Table 4 ), demonstrated that a reduction in dog’s total weekly walking duration during the lockdown was associated with dog owners who were vulnerable or were living with a vulnerable household member compared to not ( p = 0.04) and nearly significant with owners who lived alone compared to with others ( p = 0.06).

Group differences for self-reports on ADHD were marginally significant, with participants who played SC ( M = 12.33, SE = 0.74) reporting higher scores than those who played UT ( M = 10.24, SE = 0.76), t (33) = 1.98, p = 0.06, d = 0.67.

However, the hypothesized negative association between relatedness need satisfaction and social media addiction was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), and Hypothesis 5 was not supported.

Total caloric intake was marginally significant (p < 0.06) between children of single-parent households (1910 ± 24) and dual-parent households (1,860 ± 25).

For the person with stroke, the results indicated a marginally non-significant time effect for improvements in depressive symptoms (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.78, F(2, 23) = 3.23, p = 0.06).

In addition, mentors showed an increasing trend in general for self-efficacy (V = 6.5, p = 0.06; see Figure 8 ), with seven of ten participants demonstrating gains from pre- to post-mentoring. 3.2.3.

A near-significant ( p = 0.06) relationship was observed between acrylamide metabolites and observation of incense.

The direct effect was marginally significant (estimate = 0.08, SE = 0.04, t = 1.91, p = 0.06, 95% CI: −0.0022, 0.1699). 3.3.

Although not reaching full statistical significance, there was a notable difference of opinion on the effect of smoke between males and females in these three conditions, approaching significance ( p = 0.06 by the Chi-square test). 3.7.

The ethics program’s scope significantly reduces the frequency of negative feelings (B = −0.38; p < 0.05) but has no impact on the frequency of positive feelings (B = 0.32; p < 0.06; marginally significant) or satisfaction with life (B = 0.04; n.s.) ( Table 3 ).

Interestingly, conversational recommender users getting popularity-driven information were also 1.5 times more likely to be present at policy-driven attractions (approaching significance at p = 0.06) compared to participants getting popularity-driven information by passive app.

The effect size was moderate to high, but the differences at Time 2 were only partially maintained at Time 3, and multivariate tests indicated only marginal significance for burnout ( p = 0.06).