Barely Significant

Excerpts

7,030 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0911.8× alphagold
Third, regarding the test of the indirect effects of empathic concern, perspective taking, and personal distress on the relation between attachment avoidance and altruistic behaviors, results indicated that the mediating effect of empathic concern was significant, β = −0.229, SE = 0.074, p = 0.002, Bootstrap 95% CI = [−0.432, −0.026] (medium effect size) [ 58 ]; the mediating effect of perspective taking was marginally significant, β = −0.051, SE = 0.030, p = 0.091, Bootstrap 95% CI = [−0.128, 0.026] (low effect size) [ 58 ]; and the mediating effect of personal distress was not significant, β = 0.003, SE = 0.011, p = 0.761, Bootstrap 95% CI = [−0.043, 0.043].
marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
As shown in Table 3 , although some p -values were marginally significant, individuals who had received at least a senior school diploma had a 4.71-fold (RR = 4.71, p = 0.093) and 3.48-fold (RR = 3.48, p = 0.039) probability of being classified in Class 3 than in Classes 1 and 2, respectively.
a positive trendp = 0.0951.9× alphagold
For the muscle strength and endurance measurements, the E-Fit group showed a positive trend in the isometric curl-up test when compared to the control group between the 6- to 12-month follow-ups ( p = 0.095), but the difference was not sustained at the 12-month follow-up. 3.3.
at the edge of significancep = 0.0982.0× alphagold
Highly trained participants (stronger participants) showed a stronger loss of RTD compared to weaker athletes, since moderated negative correlation at the edge of significance was found between the absolute maximal isometric knee extension torque and the relative decrease in RTD after training at altitude (R = −0.589; p = 0.098).
marginally significantp = 0.0992.0× alphagold
Similar results were observed for PM 2.5 (highest versus lowest tertile: aOR = 1.79 (95% CI: 1.02–3.13), whereas the result for PM 10 was marginally significant (highest versus lowest tertile: aOR = 1.57 (95% CI: 0.92–2.69; p = 0.099).
a statistical trendp < 0.102.0× alphagold
For both the ABI and the PVR, there was a statistical trend ( p < 0.10) towards better results in the intervention group compared to the control group, but the results were not statistically significantly different between the two groups during the 12 months of follow-up ( p = 0.061 and p = 0.077, respectively) ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.
marginally significantp < 0.102.0× alphagold
We further probed any significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) simple moderation by conducting simple slope analyses, examining the effect of complicated grief or general grief on depression or anxiety at varying levels (i.e., 1 standard deviation below the mean, the mean, and 1 standard deviation above the mean) of nature-related variables. 4.
near significancep = 0.12.0× alphagold
In South Africa, significant associations included having more friends, which was negatively associated with ART adherence, as well as near significance ( p = 0.1) for negative associations with betweenness centrality and also for the number of same-gender network members.