Barely Significant

Excerpts

8,476 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
WN injections displayed no significant difference regarding the mean elasticity modulus (EM; 0.992 kPa) when compared to not injected controls (1.176 kPa; Figure 2 ), while WJ injections caused in one experiment a highly significant reduction of the cellular EM from 0.891 to 0.440 kPa ( p < 0.001, Figure 3 ) when compared to their corresponding controls.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In common wheat ‘Dakotana,’ highly significant correlations were observed between the dry weight of roots and root colonization ( r = 0.93, p < 0.001) in drought conditions, whereas under well-watered the root traits showed a reverse manner, and even highly negative relations between root volume and root colonization were observed ( r = −0.99, p < 0.001) ( Tables S1–S7 ). 2.5.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to rhBMP2+T0070907−, rhBMP2+T0070907+ showed a highly significant reduction in the differentiation efficiency of porcine beige adipocytes ( p < 0.001), suggesting that the addition of T0070907 diminished the effect of rhBMP2 in promoting the differentiation of porcine beige adipocytes ( Figure 5 B,C).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant main effect of training day on both escape latency (F(3, 72) = 58.61, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.71; Greenhouse–Geisser corrected) and path length (F(3, 72) = 85.92, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.78; Figure 4 A,B), indicating that all groups, including the LPS-induced model group, acquired the task across the training period.
partially significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, these associations were markedly attenuated in IL skin, where the correlations between CYP27B1 and the same genes were weaker or only partially significant: CTNNA1 (r = 0.76, p < 0.001), CDH1 (r = 0.30, p = 0.181), and TJP1 (r = 0.59, p = 0.005). 2.4.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
SHRs (ADHD model) who received either MDL (5-HT2A antagonist) or IPS (5-HT1A agonist) or GFC (alpha-2 adrenergic agonist) showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in these study parameters (mean distance traveled, mean movement velocity) when compared to the SHR-NC group ( Figure 1 A,B).