Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,102 sentences · 1 filter applied

almost reached significancep = 0.0080.2× alpha
This difference was significant at the ages of 12 and 24 months, as well as at the age of 6 years, and almost reached significance at the age of 6 months and 10 years (28 vs. 35°, p = 0.008; 28 vs. 35°, p = 0.002; 28 vs. 34°, p = 0.001; 28 vs. 36°, p = 0.056 and 30 vs. 36°, p = 0.075, respectively).
moderately significantp = 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In the HF group (59 patients), PWV demonstrated a positive moderately significant correlation with creatinine ( r = 0.33; p = 0.01), RDW ( r = 0.31; p = 0.02); NT-proBNP ( r = 0.28; p = 0.049), brachial SP ( r = 0.33; p = 0.01), central SP ( r = 0.29; p = 0.02), and a negative moderately significant correlation with eGFR ( r = −0.40; p = 0.002) ( Figure 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation Analysis of Two-Dimensional CPs to Three-Dimensional SASN Correlation analysis revealed strong, statistically highly significant correlations between A min and the two-dimensional respiratory parameters SPAS (r = 0.706; p < 0.01), MPAS (r = 0.713; p < 0.01), and IPAS (r = 0.684; p < 0.01), as well as the three-dimensional parameters V PAS (r = 0.857; p < 0.01), A Sag (r = 0.708; p < 0.01), A SPAS (r = 0.812; p < 0.01), A MPAS (r = 0.888; p < 0.01), and A IAS (r = 0.835; p < 0.01; Table 4 ).
Within the breathing control subgroup, gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) scores showed a trend favoring the abdominal breathing regimen (SMD = −0.74; 95% CI: −2.06 to 0.57), though this did not reach statistical significance, and heterogeneity remained high ( I 2 = 85.9%, p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
This was further confirmed through Spearman’s rank correlation between subjective numbness and Level A or B objective response to neurosensory testing, which showed a positive (Spearman’s rho–0.441) and highly significant correlation ( p < 0.01) ( Table 4 ).
highly significantp = 0.0100.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A comparison of the median values using a one-way Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in the speech activity (% PET, H = 9.166, p = 0.010), CARS score (H = 16.209, p = 0.0003) and SNAP-IV score (H = 10.148, p = 0.006) during the six month follow-up period. 3.4.