Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Maternal iron supplementation in pregnancy was associated with increased offspring weight ( p = 0.005), head circumference ( p = 0.02), BMI ( p = 0.01), and skinfold thicknesses in three of the four sites ( p = 0.03–0.003) (the fourth having a borderline significance of p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Given the exploratory nature of the work, marginally significant results ( p = 0.05 to p = 0.08) were also identified where these conferred with significant effects in a similar measure, to ensure no effects were missed. p -values are used to denote effects of interest considering the absence of any suggestion at present on the clinical significance of any measure of sweet taste liking or preference [ 31 ]. 3.
approached significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
In maternal breastmilk samples on days 14 and 28, no SCFAs were significantly different for infants with BPD compared to no BPD, or ROP compared to no ROP, after adjusting for multiple comparisons ( Table 3 ); however, in infants’ stool samples on day 14, acetic acid approached significance for infants with BPD compared to no BPD (446 ± 564 vs. 1000 ± 712 μg/g, adjusted p = 0.05) ( Table 4 ).
a decreasing trendp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Finally, in the old groups, our investigations revealed that p16 exhibited a decreasing trend when comparing the control with the treated cells; in particular, p16 expression was significantly reduced in the fibroblasts treated with both CP ( p = 0.05) and Voghera pepper extracts ( p = 0.02) ( Figure 9 , Panel Z, right) ( Table 7 ). 3.6.
on the margin of significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
When we compared the postprandial leptin levels between the HC and HF-meals, we found that men with normal body weight showed a tendency, which was on the margin of significance ( p = 0.05), to higher leptin concentrations 240 min after the HC-meal intake ( Figure 2 B).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
When examining weight loss categorically (achievement of 5% weight loss or more), however, there was a marginally significant interaction between Weighing at post and food addiction (χ 2 (1) = 3.98, p = 0.05) and significant main effects of Weighing at post (χ 2 (1) = 10, p = 0.002) and food addiction (χ 2 (1) = 4.73, p = 0.03).
only marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Some genetic variants of genes encoding crystallin proteins and antioxidant enzymes have been reported to contribute to the underlying mechanisms of ARC, but the reported results were only marginally significant ( p = 0.05) or non-significant [ 3 , 5 , 6 ].