Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = .0551.1× alphagold
Furthermore, the MANCOVA on the same aPET ROI and the bilateral OFC fNIRS revealed a significant group effect [ F (6, 174) = 6.64, p < .001], leading to a significant effect on amyloid PET [ F (3, 88) = 11.46, p < .001] and a marginally significant effect on fNIRS [ F (3, 88) = 2.63, p = .055], Overall, Fig 6 shows that the amyloid PET signal tends to better differentiate the AD group from others, and the fNIRS signal tends to differentiate the SMI group from the other groups. fNIRS and anatomical measures When the LME model was fitted to the anatomical measures, no significant correlation between the fNIRS ROIs and gray volume or cortical thickness was found above and beyond what the group difference could explain.
borderline significancep = 0.0551.1× alpha
There was a low but borderline significance (Mann Whitney test, p = 0.055) of the viral genome load in the anti-EBOV IgG treated guinea pigs compared to the untreated animals, with a 3-log median value decrease obtained on day 3 post-infection (i.e., as assessed in 10 animals, in the serum harvested before the second injection of anti-EBOV IgGs in group 4).
a strong trendp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
A priori planned comparisons using one-tailed paired t-tests revealed significantly higher scores for dilemmas with humanized than neutral persons on the H scale (H umanized : M = 60.7, SE = 2,5, N eutral : M = 56.2, SE = 2.5, T(53) = 2.36, p = 0.011), a strong trend towards higher scores on the PD scale for dilemmas with H umanized persons (H umanized : M = 59.5, SE = 3.3, N eutral : M = 56.0, SE = 2.6, T(53) = 1.63, p = 0.055), and a weaker trend towards higher scores on the EC scale (H umanized : M = 56.4, SE = 2,5, N eutral : M = 53.8, SE = 2.5, T(53) = 1.30, p = 0.099).
close to significanceP -value = 0.0551.1× alpha
Using logistic regression with principal components as covariates we found an association of the novel SNV in cases with mood-incongruent psychotic BP compared with controls that was statistically significant in a dominant model (OR = 1.73, P -value = 0.039) and close to significance in an additive model (OR = 1.64, P -value = 0.055).
marginally significantP -value = 0.0551.1× alphagold
We genotyped this variant in the GAIN BP case-control samples and found a marginally significant association with mood-incongruent psychotic BP compared with controls (additive model: OR = 1.64, P -value = 0.055; dominant model: OR = 1.73.