Serotonin tissue content, which was significantly less than NE tissue content in striatum, was not significantly affected, although there was a notable trend toward a decrease ( p = 0.055).
Excerpts
Furthermore, the MANCOVA on the same aPET ROI and the bilateral OFC fNIRS revealed a significant group effect [ F (6, 174) = 6.64, p < .001], leading to a significant effect on amyloid PET [ F (3, 88) = 11.46, p < .001] and a marginally significant effect on fNIRS [ F (3, 88) = 2.63, p = .055], Overall, Fig 6 shows that the amyloid PET signal tends to better differentiate the AD group from others, and the fNIRS signal tends to differentiate the SMI group from the other groups. fNIRS and anatomical measures When the LME model was fitted to the anatomical measures, no significant correlation between the fNIRS ROIs and gray volume or cortical thickness was found above and beyond what the group difference could explain.
borderline significancep = 0.055
There was a low but borderline significance (Mann Whitney test, p = 0.055) of the viral genome load in the anti-EBOV IgG treated guinea pigs compared to the untreated animals, with a 3-log median value decrease obtained on day 3 post-infection (i.e., as assessed in 10 animals, in the serum harvested before the second injection of anti-EBOV IgGs in group 4).
a trend toward significancep = 0.055
Analysis of OT-E Time scores revealed that the trained group showed a trend toward significance for improvement over the six month of training (p = 0.055, Supporting Information, Table S3 ) while the control group did not show any significant improvement ( Fig. 1D ).
A priori planned comparisons using one-tailed paired t-tests revealed significantly higher scores for dilemmas with humanized than neutral persons on the H scale (H umanized : M = 60.7, SE = 2,5, N eutral : M = 56.2, SE = 2.5, T(53) = 2.36, p = 0.011), a strong trend towards higher scores on the PD scale for dilemmas with H umanized persons (H umanized : M = 59.5, SE = 3.3, N eutral : M = 56.0, SE = 2.6, T(53) = 1.63, p = 0.055), and a weaker trend towards higher scores on the EC scale (H umanized : M = 56.4, SE = 2,5, N eutral : M = 53.8, SE = 2.5, T(53) = 1.30, p = 0.099).
The association between self-reported history of injection drug use and symptoms of depressive disorder was marginally significant (p = 0.055).
Alone, ERQ-Reappraisal was a marginally significant predictor of reaction times, F (1, 83.4) = 3.79, p = .055.
Supratidal invertebrates Taxa richness in the fallout traps had a trend towards being lowest at Restore Low, but there were no significant differences, although the pairwise difference between Protect Low and Restore Low was marginally significant ( p = 0.055) ( S1 Fig , Tables 1 , 2 , S3 Table ).
slightly non-significantp = 0.055
When both the geoindex smooth term and a linear kernel density of treatment term were entered together in the GAM model, the treatment variable became slightly non-significant (p = 0.055, Table 3 ).
showed a trendp = 0.055
SNPs rs10507172 and rs10507173 were associated with IL-2 production ( p = 0.002) while two other SNPs (rs1305392 and rs1920413) showed a trend towards association with IL-2 production ( p = 0.055 and 0.080, respectively) (general linearized model, Fig 2A, 2C, 2E and 2G ).
showed a trendp = 0.055
Lastly, the item standing on a balance beam (BOT-2), showed a trend towards differences between the two groups on pre-test values ( t = -2.06, df = 16.59, p = 0.055, corrected for unequal variance; TD 9.9 (0.33) DCD 8.6 (SD 2.4).
This difference is slightly significant according to a two-sided Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.055).
close to significanceP -value = 0.055
Using logistic regression with principal components as covariates we found an association of the novel SNV in cases with mood-incongruent psychotic BP compared with controls that was statistically significant in a dominant model (OR = 1.73, P -value = 0.039) and close to significance in an additive model (OR = 1.64, P -value = 0.055).
However, the effect of the social treatment on dopamine levels in RA fell just short of statistical significance in the present study (p = 0.055; Table 1 ).
did not quite reach significanceP = 0.055
A similar trend was observed for τ 2 , but this did not quite reach significance (P = 0.055, t = 2.378, df = 6; One Sample T-test).
However, the main effect of the vertical transition was significant (F(2,2289) = 5.61, p = .004, 1− β = .859), while it was marginally significant for the vertical oscillation (F(2,2289) = 2.91, p = .055, 1− β = .570).
approached significancep = 0.055
The difference in connectivity between the right aI/fO node and right SFG only approached significance, F (1, 32) = 3.98, p = 0.055.
The marginally significant correlation (r = .24, p = .055) indicates that the agency attributed to Pinocchio plays a role in inducing the effect.
borderline non-significantP = 0.055
The LS extension difference between the two strains is borderline non-significant (Non-parametric Mann-Whitney Test; P = 0.055).
Centroid size showed no effects of near significance with the exception of an average increase among males in the 100 mg/kg bw dose group (CS = 45.6±1.1, p = 0.055).
Using spatial randomization procedures ( Figure S4 ) and home made R scripts we were able to show that outbreaks localities tend to be closer to refugee areas ( Figure S5 ) than expected by chance alone, though being marginally significant ( P = 0.055).
We genotyped this variant in the GAIN BP case-control samples and found a marginally significant association with mood-incongruent psychotic BP compared with controls (additive model: OR = 1.64, P -value = 0.055; dominant model: OR = 1.73.
Gastrocnemius, a predominantly glycolytic muscle, was significantly smaller in 8-week smoke exposed mice when compared to their counterparts, whereas only a tendency toward significance was found between both groups after 24 weeks (p = 0.055).
We also noted a strong trend ( p = 0.055) in the GSV for the same phenomenon.
Younger disclosure age was associated with significantly higher mean CD4 counts over the course of the study (p = 0.001), and a nonsignificant trend toward a higher mean ART adherence percentage (p = 0.055).