Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

nearly significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
d) Effects of toxoplasmosis on rated pleasantness of odors Repeated measure ANCOVA with attributed pleasantness of six odors (including the neutral sample) as repeated measures and toxoplasmosis, sex, Rh, intensity of smoking and age as an independent variables revealed only significant effects of sex (p = 0.009, η 2 = 0.059), type of odor (p < 0.0005, η 2 = 0.056), sex-type of odor interaction (p < 0.0005, η 2 = 0.060), and a nearly significant effect of smoking (p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.032), Fig 3 .
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Post hoc paired samples T-tests showed that this bias was significant for numerosity 12 [ t (1,28) = −16,89, p <0.001], numerosity 28 [ t (1,28) = −2.77, p = 0.01], numerosity 36 [ t (1,28) = −2.71, p = 0.01] but marginally significant for numerosity 44 [ t (1,28) = −1,99, p = 0.056] and not significant for numerosity 20 [ t (1,28) = 0.2, p = 0.84].
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Phylogenetic Comparative Analyses We observed a significant phylogenetic signal for average infection load (P = 0.033), a marginally significant phylogenetic signal for hazard ratio (P = 0.056) and no significant phylogenetic signal for log response ratio (P = 0.118, Fig 3A–3C ; Table 1 ).
showed a trendP = 0.0561.1× alpha
The patients harboring c.3321delA (homozygous and heterozygous) displayed a trend of earlier age of onset (0.16 and 0.81 years, respectively) compared with the wild-type genotype (1.07 years), which although displayed no statistical significance but showed a trend among three groups ( P = 0.056) ( Table 4 ) .
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Variation of specialization with altitude Regarding specialization, the percentage of specialist plant and flower-visitor species increased significantly with altitude for P ( R 2 = 0.54, F 7 = 7.22, P = 0.036), and marginally significant for A ( R 2 = 0.48, F 7 = 5.58, P = 0.056) ( Fig 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Relationship between Facial Color Type and Hunting Behavior The proportion of facial color types differed marginally significant between the two types of hunting behaviors (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.056; Figure 5b ); the proportion of group-hunting species with A-type faces was higher than for species with other face types.