significantly smaller than with fura-6F alone (P = 0.009), and slightly smaller than with fura-6F and EGTA (P = 0.08).” (PMID 18832426) “The correlation becomes only marginally significant if the single experiment with the largest effect is removed (r = 0.41, P = 0.057, n = 22).” (PMID 17916607) Implied or gross spin (i.e. spin other than interpreting p-values between 0.05 and 0.1 as trends or statistically significant) was noted incidentally in papers before (n = 10) and after (n = 9) the editorial advice was published.
Excerpts
just missed significancep = .057
The interaction of the effect of piercing with hemisphere and group just missed significance, F(1,30) = 3.9, p = .057, η p 2 = .12, 1-β = .98.
In general, though only approaching significance, participants exhibited higher variations in the GEM direction in the DT-paper ( p = 0.057) condition compared to the ST condition, while these variations slightly increased in the DT-phone ( p = 0.197) and DT-glass ( p = 0.374) conditions ( Fig 6 , top).
Significant sex differences were also noted for FEV 1 /FVC ratio among patients with CADs, with males showing values -0.07 (-0.12, -0.02) (p = 0.007) less than females’ post- bronchodilator, with the pre- bronchodilator differences approaching significance as well (-0.05 (-0.1, 0), p = 0.057).
approached significancep = 0.057
Ethnicity and menopausal status alone were not found to be significant but an interaction between IHC group, ethnicity and menopausal status approached significance (p = 0.057) ( Fig 2D–2E ) and might be worth exploring with a larger samples size (each group limited to a sample size of ~10 or less).
Additionally, in the ipsilateral workspace, this difference was also modulated by the which hand is used factor (F(1,26) = 4.553, p = .042, η 2 p = .149) suggesting that the group difference was nearly significant only when comparing participants having used the left hand to perform the task (F(1,10) = 4.623, p = .057, η 2 p = .316; CRPS patients: M = -3.59% ± 4.83%; control participants: M = -0.76% ± 2.23%).
a trend towards significancep < 0.057
In the coronal plane, the markerless system matched the marker-based system in the “upright” (R 2 0.799, p < 0.001), “palms” (R 2 0.454, p < 0.008), “elbows, extended knees” (R 2 0.639, p < 0.001), “elbows, bent knees” (R 2 0.714, p < 0.001), “squat” (R 2 0.653, p < 0.015), and “B-Ball” (R 2 0.630, p < 0.001) positions, with a trend towards significance in “all-4s” (R 2 0.270, p < 0.057).
In our study, the expression of miR-6767-5p was positively correlated with SHBG ( P < 0.05), and the expression of miR-6767-5p was negatively correlated with FAI at a marginally significant level ( P = 0.057).
Nevertheless, this difference was not statistically significant for the 100 mg/kg cohort ( p = 0.200, Mann-Whitney U test) and only borderline significant for the 300 mg/kg group ( p = 0.057, Mann-Whitney U test).
This amelioration reached statistical significance ( p <0.05) for IL-6 and OPG with a strong trend ( p = 0.057) for IL-8. β -AET promotes differentiation of Human MSC Mesenchymal stems cells prepared as previously described [36] and treated with β-AET showed an average of 100–200% increase in the number of cells bearing the osteopontin ( Figure 2 ) but not the osteonectin marker (data not shown).
As shown in Figure 3B , Real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay showed an increasing gradient of gene expression of TGF-β1 in the groups carrying CC, CT and TT genotypes, although there was merely a borderline significant difference between CC and CT groups ( p = 0.057).
approached significancep = 0.057
The difference between conNHQ and NHQ only approached significance (t(114) = 1.9, CI: −0.01–0.71, p = 0.057).
An almost significant between-subject effect was found for Clarity, F (1,15) = 4.265, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.221, and a significant effect for Engagement, F (1,15) = 4.957, p = 0.042, η p 2 = 0.248, and Gender, F (1,15) = 9.521, p = 0.008, η p 2 = 0.388, females have higher RR, while participants with higher RR have higher Engagement but possibly lower Clarity.
sylvaticus was not quite significant (4.68, p = 0.057).
a trend towards significancep = 0.057
Interestingly, a trend towards significance was found when the difference of the final QSU score minus pre QSU score was post hoc compared between groups, t (47) = -1.948, p = 0.057, with an increase in the QSU-brief score only in the control group, suggestive of increased smoking-urges in the control, but not the mindfulness group ( Table 1 ).
borderline significancep = 0.057
A borderline significance of uKIM-1 in predicting CKD stage 3 independently in the community-based population was observed (pooled adjusted relative risk: 1.13[1.00 to 1.27], p = 0.057).
showed a trendP = 0.057
When the association between DPB1 and GPA/PR3-AAV was examined, DPB1*04 : 01 (the risk allele for GPA in European populations) also showed a trend for association with predisposition to PR3-AAV in the Japanese population (P = 0.057, OR = 1.89, 95%CI: 1.03–3.45) ( Table 4 ).
A significant difference was found between the Early Intermediate Period and the Late Intermediate Period (p = 0.022), and a nearly significant difference between the Early Intermediate Period and the Middle Horizon (p = 0.057).
For LDL-C levels, estimates of sex-specific heritability were marginally significant in both sexes, with complete heritability indicated for males ( h 2 = 1.000, P = 0.057) and a more moderate heritability detected for females ( h 2 = 0.225, P = 0.075).
The number of metastatic lesions affected PFS with a statistical trend (P = 0.057).
The encoding time for initial fixations was 214ms ( SD = 23ms) for the upper screen and 220ms ( SD = 21ms) for the lower screen; this difference is marginally significant, t (14) = 2.08, p = .057.
showed a trendp =0.057
Hands in inward rotated position Statistical analysis of the ERP RRN amplitudes showed a trend towards a rotation x view interaction F(1, 9)=4.76; p =0.057; ƞ 2 =.35.
approached significanceP = 0.057
Additive genetic, intra-individual, maternal and house variance components Heritability for the prevalence of gametocytes during clinical presentation only approached significance during the Fansidar period (P = 0.057) ( Table 4 , Figure 4 ).
approached significanceP = 0.057
Model behaviour only approached significance as an independent predictor ( F = 2.70, df = 3, P = 0.057), while model familiarity was non-significant ( F = 2.77, df = 1, P = 0.109).
approached significancep = 0.057
While this model did not reach statistical significance; perspective taking was the only variable that approached significance, ß = 0.388, t = 1.99, p = 0.057.