Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally nonsignificantP = 0.0591.2× alphagold
We found a marginally nonsignificant positive relationship between BCI and corticosterone metabolite concentrations in females during incubation ( Fig 6A , F 1, 40 = 3.75, P = 0.059), but not in females ( Fig 6B , F 1,47 = 0.78, P = 0.38) nor males ( Fig 6C , F 1,56 = 0.53, P = 0.46) during nestling feeding (see S4 Table for model details).
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Although some cyanobacterial species ( Aphanizomenon gracile and Microcystis botrys ) showed a negative response to grazing in July ( Table 2 ), these results coincided with a positive effect of grazer abundance on the net growth rate of the most abundant species Dolichospermum crassum (marginally significant, p = 0.059, Table 2 , Fig 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Phase-locking factor (PLF) Similar to the ERSP data, examination of the different genetic models yielded a marginally significant met-dominant model in the difference PLF (error-correct) (F(1,52) = 3.72, p = 0.059, η = 0.26; the linear model was not significant: p>0.15), indicating that the error-effect is modulated by the polymorphism (see Figure 3 /B).
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Sex of the host influenced transmission in both cases, but conversely: females were associated with a higher probability of infection in birds (OR: 3.98 [95% CI: 1.48–10.72]), whereas in mice, males were more likely to transmit infection (marginally significant association, p = 0.059, OR: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.09–1.93]) than females.
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Pairwise comparisons of the two learning rates in each subgroup showed a significant difference between the two in the “Learning Charity” subgroup (t 6 = 8.53, p<0.0001) with greater learning rate for self than charity and a marginally significant difference between the two in the “Learning Self” subgroup (t 11 = −2.104, p = 0.059) with greater learning rate for charity than self.
showed a trendp-value = 0.0591.2× alpha
As for the shell layer test, we observed no significant differences across mapping statistics other than higher 5’ C-to-T rates when processing the outer prismatic shell layer (t-test = −4.81, df = 4, p-value = 0.004), which also showed a trend for lower endogenous DNA content (t-test = 1.98, df = 4, p-value = 0.059; Figs 2 and 3 ; S2 Table ).