Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

a statistical trendp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
Questionnaire None of the ANOVAs for complexity (F(1,14) = 0.358, p = 0.559), accuracy (F(1,14) = 0.071, p = 0.794) and intuitiveness ratings were indicative of relevant differences, yet there was a statistical trend in the within-subjects factor Method of the intuitiveness rating (F(1,14) = 4.230, p = 0.059), whereby participants show a trend to rate the PM-method as being more intuitive than the VAS-method (See Figure 3 ).
a trend towards significanceP = 0.0591.2× alpha
Besides mitotic index, tumor size and site, SKP2 high expression (RR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.41–5.99, P = 0.004) and KIT exon 11 deletion (RR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.04–7.16, P = 0.041) were also independent risk factors in multivariate analysis, with gastrointestinal bleeding also showing a trend towards significance (RR = 1.88, 95% CI: 0.98–3.64, P = 0.059).
near-significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
All 3 groups of riders made an increase in lateral movement between sections 4 and 5 in response to the hazard ( p <0.001), but the advanced riders displayed less lateral movement than the experienced riders ( p <0.05) and demonstrated a near-significant difference when compared to the novice riders ( p = 0.059).
marginally significantp = 0.0591.2× alphagold
There was a significant effect of selfish intention (β 3 = −1.85, t = −3.25, p<0.01), but no significant effect of generous intention (β 4 = 0.75, t = 1.02, p = 0.31), and a marginally significant interaction between stingy intent and stingy outcome (β 5 = −3.03, t = −1.91, p = 0.059) but no significant interaction between generous intention and generous outcome (β 6 = −0.39, t = −0.29, p = 0.77).
marginally significantp = .0591.2× alphagold
The inverted image yielded marginally significant differences in change ratios ( F (2,26) = 3.165, p = .059, η 2 = 0.196)(see Fig. 2 , bottom row).
Pareidolia in infants.
PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4331561