Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

barely missed significanceP = 0.0591.2× alpha
When this control set is used instead of our healthy subjects, the association of early-onset SLE barely missed significance level (P = 0.059) due to the small sample size of the controls; however, the OR was 1.47 (95%CI 0.99–2.19), and was slightly higher than the OR observed with our controls (1.44, Table 2 ).
marginally non-significantP = 0.0591.2× alpha
There was a marginally non-significant difference between treatment groups during t 1 ( β (SE) = 4.67 (2.24), t = 2.08, P = 0.059), while no difference was observed between treatment groups during t 2 and t 3 ( t 2 : β (SE) = 0.64 (1.99), t = 0.32, P = 0.755; t 3 : β (SE) = –0.03 (2.07), t = 0.02, P = 0.987; Fig 1a ).
close to significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
Two pairwise comparisons were found to be significant, namely, those involving scops owls and little owls (R = 0.402, p = 0.004), and scops owls and tawny owls (R = 0.338, p = 0.002); the comparison between scops owls and barn owls was close to significance (R = 0.162, p = 0.059).
showed a trendP = 0.0591.2× alpha
After 6 weeks of WD feeding, female CCL3 −/− →LDLR −/− mice showed a significant decrease in lesion area compared to their controls ( P <0.05; Figure 1A ), while male CCL3 −/− →LDLR −/− mice showed a trend toward a reduction in aortic root lesion area compared to C57BL/6→LDLR −/− controls ( P = 0.059; Figure 1B ).
showed a trendp = 0.05931.2× alpha
Calcium accumulation in channelled constructs showed a trend towards a significant increase, as compared to solid constructs, at 4 weeks post-implantation (4.37±0.61 vs. 3.27±0.33%ww, p = 0.0593), with this difference becoming significant at 8 weeks post-implantation (7.97±1.15 vs. 5.12±0.53%ww, p <0.0001).
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The 3×2×6 mixed ANOVA with between-subjects factors group (learners, non-learners, or controls), and within-subjects factors training run (first run, last run) and BMA parameter (V-SPL, SPL-V, up_V, up_SPL, up_V-SPL, up_SPL-V) revealed a significant main effect of group (F(1,2) = 5.49, p = 0.04), a significant main effect of BMA parameter (F(1,5) = 3.66, p = 0.01), and a strong trend towards significance in the 3-way interaction between group×training run×BMA parameter (F(1,10) = 1.91, p = 0.06).