Excerpts

A similar trend was found for late instar nymphs (upper nodes: 0.26±0.08 mm 2 , n = 8; lower nodes: 0.20±0.06 mm 2 , n = 11) but differences were only marginally significant ( F 1, 17 = 3.85; P = 0.0665).

The variation in the survival rate among these groups approached significance (glm, binomial response variable, logit link, χ 2 = 7.2, df = 3,218, P = 0.0666).

Thus, there is an apparent association between the intact activity of ADAM12-L and the triple-negative status of tumors, although this association is only borderline significant due to the small sample size ( P = 0.0667, Fisher’s exact test).

Parental education had a marginally nonsignificant positive association with hit rates (γ 01 = .002, t = 2.03, p = .067).

Comparing patients with controls for the whole image showed a significantly higher value of D b (p = 0.020) and a statistical trend for elevated D m (p = 0.067) in patients.

Regarding occupation, depression scores were significantly higher among respondents in the home maid/ housekeeping group than those working for security, and nearly significant (P = 0.067) than those involved in driving.

For Frantic Hopelessness a marginally significant difference in mean score was found 18.8 versus 16.8, two tailed p = 0.067 (equal variances not assumed, Levene’s test for equal variances p = 0.08).

A marginally significant effect of familiarity emerged, F (1,14) = 3.958, p = .067, η 2 partial = .220, reflecting the tendency of participants in committing more errors when the face was familiar (i.e., White, M = 4.4% SE = 1.2), as compared to when it was unfamiliar (i.e., green multi-racial, M = 3.3% SE = .9).

For the IQ-matched control group there was only a marginally significant main effect of TRIPLET, (F(1,12) = 4.05, MSE = 0.001, p = 0.067, η p 2 = 0.25), whereas the main effect of EPOCH was not significant, (F(3,36) = 0.48, MSE = 0.004, p = 0.70, η p 2 = 0.04).

Although necrosis had borderline significance (p = 0.067), it was entered into the multivariable logistic regression analysis, according to previous studies [ 10 , 12 , 31 ].

There were marginally significant differences in P1 amplitude for no makeup, light makeup, and heavy makeup, Makeup type: F (2, 21) = 3.08, p = .067, η p 2 = .23.

However, further statistical analysis (Tukey’s post hoc test) revealed significant differences between these two groups only for IL-6 and IL-17A (p = 0.011 and p = 0.002, respectively) while a difference trending towards significance was found for IFNγ (p = 0.067), most likely because of the high variability observed within the 3 short-term treatment groups for this cytokine.

However, the predictor ‘species’ was close to significance in the reputation-learning model ( p = .067) and the model stability was good (see the range of estimates in S2 Table ), so it is possible that wolves may have preferred the generous partner after direct experience.

Interestingly, in this WTCCC study, the minor allele revealed a borderline significant signal of opposite effect in rheumatoid arthritis [p = 0.067; OR (95%CI) = 0.91 (0.83–1.01)], in agreement with the meta-analysis recently published (OR = 0.87, [7] ).

Controlling for the influence of subregional differences, generalised linear mixed models showed that elevation was significantly and positively related to species richness (estimated coefficient = 0.75, standard error = 0.20, t value = 3.72, P = 0.0002, n = 69) and, albeit marginally significant, abundance (estimated coefficient = 1.16, standard error = 0.66, t value = 1.83, P = 0.067, n = 69).

Comparisons between the two groups Since ANOVA and post hoc testing showed a trend for significance between patients with treatment-resistant depression and those with acute depression in some scales (paranoia, P = 0.0670; mania, P = 0.1074), we used Student's t-test to detect small differences between the two groups.

Histological examination in mice dying of rupture showed a trend towards reduced infarct size in the anti-MIF treated group (37±5% vs. 33±4%, P=0.067 ).

There was a close-to-significant small correlation between syncopation and joint audio entropy ( r = .259, p = .067), which may have been caused by both measures representing complexity, albeit based on different methods of computation: A syncopated pattern might be described in terms of uncertainty (unexpected note onsets), but uncertainty can be expressed in other ways than syncopation (e.g. microtiming).

However, men did expect a bigger goal difference than women (men: 1.64±0.16; women: 1.24±0.10, t 48 = 2.07, p = 0.043), and although marginally significant, men found the match more frustrating (men: 3.16±0.34; women; 2.16±0.41, t 48 = −1.88, p = 0.067) and were bigger soccer fans than women (men: 0.22±0.16; women: −0.21±0.14, t 48 = 2.00, p = 0.051).

One-way ANOVAs on each variable indicated that the only significant univariate result was that frogs showed a seasonal difference in horizontal movements between day and night locations (F 1,29 = 6.980, P = 0.013), although the seasonal difference in vertical movements between day and night locations was nearly significant (F 1,29 = 3.619, P = 0.067).

Experiment 2: Adult morphology In adulthood, PA female pancreatic sections, compared to controls, showed a trend ( P = 0.067) towards reduced fraction of small islets, ranging from 100 to 1100 μm 2 in size (data not shown) and decreased islet counts ( P = 0.068; control 8.25 (±0.75); PA 6.11 (±0.74))/μm 2 ×10 −6 ) (data not shown).

The split-sample models also were consistent with those reported above, but it is important to note the impact of 5-HTTLPR was only marginally significant for the pre-9/11 cases in the rare-events logistic regression model ( n = 632, b = 1.170, standard error for b = .638, z = 1.83, p = .067).

Including saturated fatty acids calculated from food records to the models did not change the results nor did including the serum phospholipid fatty acids myristic acid, palmitic acid, omega-3 fatty acids and C15∶0, except for HDL cholesterol in which the association with C17∶0/C21∶0 became borderline significant (P = 0.067).

One partner effect was moderated by gender: the effect of provided support had a distinct trend toward significance in women ( B = 0.58, SE = 0.31, p = 0.067), and was not significant in men ( B = -.32, SE = 0.28, p = 0.271).

After adjusting for multiple variables ( Table 2 ), the ORs of the 1 st quintile was also larger than the OR of the 5 th quintile with marginal significance ( P = 0.067).