Excerpts

The C/N showed marginally significant correlations with arsenic resistance ( p = 0.069) and carbon cycling genes ( p = 0.073), and significant correlation with nitrogen fixation genes ( p = 0.024).

For S2, confidence was nearly significantly higher with both channels of feedback than with pressure only, though this difference was not quite significant (p = 0.069), while confidence with both types of feedback was statistically indistinguishable from proprioception only (p = 1).

Ammonium addition also appeared to increase necrosis incidence, although the effect was only marginally significant (p = 0.0692), likely due to the high variability of this variable.

CCR9 −/− mice showed a trend to develop less tumors than CCR9 +/− mice (p=0.0693) ( Fig 1E , F ) and developed significantly less tumors of 2–3 mm in size ( Fig 1F ), indicating that expression CCR9 may favor colon cancer development.

Whereas no significant difference in female weight was observed 4 days after dsRNA treatment ( P = 0.9847), a marginally significant increase was observed at 8 days ( P = 0.0694) with females becoming significantly heavier at 12 days after PmRuvbl1 silencing ( P <0.0001), compared to control ( Fig 1E ).

Examination of lung pathology on day 9 showed that Myd88 -/- mice had slightly reduced overall lung pathology that approached significance (p = 0.0696) compared to WT mice ( Fig 4C ).

falciparum and mixed cases (p = 0.0025 and p <0.0001, respectively) and near significance in the P. vivax cases (p = 0.0697; Fig 4D ).

The difference in dynamic viscosity was only marginally significant in one study (P = 0.07), but it was insignificant in the other study (P = 0.2).

There was a significant improvement from baseline to post-treatment scores for all outcome measures in both groups; however, no significant interactions between treatment and visit were detected ( Table 3 ), meaning that the change from baseline was similar in the two treatment groups, although FMA-UE showed a trend for interaction (p = 0.07) with bigger changes in the M-TOTgroup.

Crucially, this analysis revealed that, overall, the stress group showed marginally greater learning of probability-based information than the control group (as indicated by the marginally significant GROUP × PROBABILITY interaction, F (1, 51) = 3.45, p = .07, η 2 p = .06; stress group: M random high = 96.34%, M random low = 101.61%, standardized learning score: M = 5.27%; control group: M random high = 97.04%, M random low = 100.89%, standardized learning score: M = 3.85%, see Fig 4 ; for a figure with individual data points, see S5 Fig in S1 File ).

For the Left ROI, there was only a trend toward significance in terms of clinically more affected side (left more affected: −0.21 ± 0.26 dB; right more affected: −0.67±0.16 dB, p = 0.07).

A Cox-model for DDFS with the three main effects for ER, PAR-1 and PAR-2, the three two-way interaction terms ER*PAR-1, ER*PAR-2 and PAR-1*PAR-2, and finally a term ER*PAR-1*PAR-2 for the three-way interaction, suggested a three-way interaction, which was almost significant (P = 0.070).

Finally, comparison of the rate of increase in CPM between CCL1 (1–73) with CCL1 (1–70) in the late phase showed a trend towards significance, both in the presence ( p = 0.07) and absence ( p = 0.05) of DEX.

Compared to total, unfractionated cell controls, KRT13 expression was significantly elevated in TIC relative to BC (P<0.05), but did not quite reach statistical significance in LC (p = 0.07).

They also had marginally significant (both p<0.07) increased odds of experiencing insomnia and Whooley-screened depression ( Table 4 ).

IL-17 was also greater in Adipo −/−/ T-cad −/− versus T-cad −/− OVA exposed, although the effect did not quite reach statistical significance (p<0.07).

This is consistent with a reported reduction in reversal frequency following starvation [38] and we also found that food-deprived worms showed a trend towards a reduction in reversal compared to well-fed worms in the food race ( Figure 6D ; p = 0.07).

In addition, differences between females and males for sacrum Peak accel (4–13%) approached significance (p = .07).

A significant main effect for sex was found for tibia Peak accel , tibia Rate accel , and sacrum Rate accel with trivial effect sizes, with sacrum Peak accel approaching significance (p = .07) ( Table 4 ).

Importantly, the two-way interaction reached a marginally significant level, F (2,54) = 2.74, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.09.

Livestock loss due to lions and respondent’s gender had negative coefficient estimates that were almost significant (coefficients -0.13, P = 0.07 and -0.13, P = 0.06, respectively).

-How might confounding variables may shift results showing survival analysis results demonstratinhg a near-significant difference in log-rank tests for DTR vs. non-DTR (p=0.07), especially given that logistic regression finds DTR to be a significant independent predictor. -Given the relatively advanced age and high comorbidity burden, do you have severity-of-illness scores (e.g., APACHE II, SOFA on admission)?

There was borderline significance between nib-to-fingertip distance and the presence of myopia (P = 0.07).

A Kruskal-Wallis test found a marginally significant difference in mean ranks across conditions, H (3) = 6.94, p = .07.

Buying price proposals in markets dominated by asks were somewhat higher compared to their counterparts, though the effect was only marginally significant (mean proposed prices of 223.09±20.63 vs. 164.99±21.81, respectively; t (36) = 1.94, p = .07).