Excerpts

In contrast, little out-group distrust was observed for either ethnic group in the southern part of Xinjiang (Korla), except that the d’ in differentiating between out-group faces+distrust words and out-group faces+trust words was marginally significant for the Uyghur, F (1, 428) = 3.28, p = .071.

When the conscientiousness score increased, the likelihood of a suicide attempt in the NIT group decreased (OR = 0.345), whereas that of the IT group had an increasing trend (OR = 1.706; p = .071).

Treatment failure was more frequent among patients treated with a 24 week regimen compared to a 12 weeks regimen (6.3%; 4/64 versus 2.5%; 43/1694), although this difference did not quite reach statistical significance ( p = 0.071 chi-squared test).

Instead, we observed a marginally significant main effect of expectation [F(1,10) = 4.095, p = 0.071]; self-reported intrinsic motivation scores were higher under high-expectation conditions.

In contrast, geographical distance to the capital, Bogotá D.C., shows a positive but marginally significant effect (OR = 1.31; p = 0.071).

Overall in the 11 NUCs treated patients MiR-B-Index showed a trend to improve [BL vs post-T-FU median values −5.86 (−13.39/6.57) vs 0.12 (−8.41/9.46), p = 0.071].

Seed length ( p = 0.071; n = 8; Spearman’s rho = 0.667; marginally significant) and weight ( p = 0.037; n = 8; Spearman’s rho = 0.738) for these populations were positively correlated with the average values of the DBH ( Fig. 1a, b ): Older populations tended to produce heavier seeds.

For ego-integrity, there were moderate, borderline significant, effect sizes post-intervention (mean difference = 8.1, 95% CI: -0.71–16.9, ES = .42, t = 1.8, df = 88, p = .071) and at follow-up (mean difference = 9.8, 95% CI: -0.13–19.6, ES = .48, t = 2.0, df = 74, p = .053).

Looking at sex-specific effects, there was no significant difference in D2 values between males from the two cage types, a cage type difference approached significance for females (F 1,16 = 3.73, p = 0.071).

While the interaction between SRPE and test delay had no significant effect on recognition certainty, χ 2 (1, N = 37) = 0.039, p = 0.84, there was an interaction between SRPEs and recognition accuracy, χ 2 (1, N = 37) = 4.56, p = 0.033, and a marginally significant three-way interaction between SRPE, recognition accuracy and test delay, χ 2 (1, N = 37) = 3.25, p = 0.071.

Analyses of the full data set indicated a marginally significant association of the APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism with cancer risk under allelic (odds ratio (OR)=1.05; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.99-1.11; P=0.071), dominant (OR=1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17; P=0.028), and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.16; P=0.026) models, with significant heterogeneity and publication bias.

For both HIV and HBV infections, exposure to forced penetrative sex approached significance (p = 0.071).

For the biological motion recognition test , only the relationship between accuracy and saccades/second tended toward significance [r = −.38, t(21) = −1.901; p = .0711] ( Table S3 ).

glycines -susceptible cultivar, the aphid density treatment factor had a marginally significant effect ( F = 3.59; df = 2,9; P = 0.0715) on numbers of females plant −1 with H. glycines population densities decreasing with increasing aphid density ( Fig. 1 ).

For the 50–70 Hz range ( Fig 2C and 2D ), a statistical trend was observed in active females in the light cycle at the age of 18 wks (4.134 ± 0.399 v. 5.688 ± 0.655, p = 0.0715, Fig 2D III ).

No significant difference in serum FGF-21 levels was observed between CHD patients with hypertension (462.2 ng/l, [59.1–2614.9], n = 97) and CHD patients without hypertension (428.2 ng/l, [77.8–1069.2] n = 38), despite an elevated trend in these CHD patients with hypertension (P = 0.0718, Figure 1C ).

Viewers of the text group were also more consistent in ratings on independence than viewers of the multimedia group at marginal significance, χ 2 (1) = 3.23, p = 0.072.

Using a linear combination post-estimation test, we find that the comparison between the indirect and direct empathy conditions is only marginally significant ( β = .749, p = .072).

Note A172 cells with STK17A knockdown had a borderline significant decrease in proliferation; p = 0.072.

A nearly significant reduction in the time constant was identified between the NC and MC cells ( p = 0.072), which was not confirmed in other electrical signatures examined in this study, as discussed in Section 4.

As predicted, there was a larger decrease in blood pressure in the disconfirming confederate condition relative to the confirming confederate condition, in the post-confederate-reaction period from minutes 19–24 (-1.09 mmHg/minute vs -0.19 mmHg/minute), a marginally significant difference, B = -0.90, z = -1.80, p = 0.072.

With respect to the difference in number of mazes solved and number of mazes indicated as solved, participants in the low mobility condition over-reported more than those in the high mobility condition on a marginally significant level, t (107) = 1.82, p = 0.072, d = .293, 95% CI [-.037, .850].

However, the difference in the relative amount of maximum correlation between the responses to the different playbacks after subtraction of randomly occurring correlations for each of the playback conditions accounts at the most for a statistical trend ( χ 2 (6) = 11.571, p = 0.072).

Interestingly and consistently, rs3761581 from the best overall model in males conferred a marginally significant role on the development of CAD (OR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.57–1.02; P = 0.072) after adjusting for age, type 2 diabetes mellitus, BMI and SBP, and in females, interaction probability of rs7119375 and rs9943582 from the best overall model reached statistical significance (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.81–0.95; P = 0.02), these findings further validating that from MDR method.

Testing-naïve older adults showed a tendency for higher recognition of near- than far-distance objects, particularly for context-atypical and unfamiliar objects, with this pattern marginally significant (p = .072) for the unfamiliar objects ( M near = .73, .85, and .79 for context-typical, context-atypical, and unfamiliar; M far = .71, .77, and .60, respectively).