Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

of marginal significancep = 0.0751.5× alpha
Screening of maternal sera with p305 (α 1G ) and with p330 (α 1H ) indicated a tendency for the CHB + and CHB − groups to have differential reactivity for the peptides, although these results were of marginal significance (p = 0.075 and 0.184 for p305/α 1G and p330/α 1H , respectively).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0751.5× alpha
The repeated measure ANOVA reported a significant main effect of the factor Muscle (F 1,9 = 3.4 p<0.001) and t-test post-hoc comparison showed that both OP and FDI were significantly more activated than ADM (p<0.05), while no significant differences could be reported between the two prime movers OP and FDI, during the pre-shaping and grasping phase of the objects presented, although a trend toward significance was clearly present (p = 0.075).
marginally significantp = 0.0751.5× alphagold
This permutation test also identified a marginally significant cluster of activity from 380 to 430 ms ( p = 0.075; 10,000 permutations), corroborated by a marginal main effect of number of words according to a 2×2 repeated-measures ANOVA on activity during this time window ( F (1,17) = 3.52; p = 0.078; two-word canonical: 3.72 nAm avg.
only marginally significantp = .0751.5× alphagold
However, for both men and women, these differences were only marginally significant between positive and negative conditions (for men: b = 0.99, SE = 0.56, t = 1.78, p = .075, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [−1.10, 2.09] (See S3 Table in S1 File ); for women: b = −1.14, SE = 0.61, t = −1.87, p = .063, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [−2.34, 0.06] (See S4 Table in S1 File ).
marginally significantp = .0751.5× alphagold
time window, a repeated measure ANOVA revealed a main effect of Laterality [ F (2, 32) = 11.23, p <.001], a marginally significant effect of the variable Intended-interpretation [ F (1, 16) = 3.61, p = .075] and a significant interaction between Intended-interpretation and Anterior-Posterior [ F (2, 32) = 5.84, p <.01].
borderline significanceP = 0.0751.5× alpha
Exposure to 7∶7 or 1∶1 min bright light cycles inhibited axial eye growth more than constant bright light (all P<0.05, except for the comparison between the 7∶7 minute cycle and the 5 h constant bright light exposure, P = 0.180 and a borderline significance between the 7∶7 minute cycle and the 1 h constant bright light exposure, P = 0.075).
showed a trendp = 0.0751.5× alpha
Neurofilament H expression was slightly reduced on day 2 after footshock ( Figure 3C: t (10) = 2.422, p = 0.035), remained unchanged on day 28 but showed a trend towards a reduction on day 60 after footshock ( Figure 3C: t (21) = 1.873, p = 0.075), while both MAP-2 and GFAP expression levels were not significantly altered at any of the three time points analyzed ( Figure 3D, E , see Table 1 for summary of all tested proteins).