Excerpts

The between-group difference in correlation coefficients was significant in the luteal phase (p = 0.03) and approached significance level in the follicular phase (p = 0.09).

The unique effect of generating a metacognitive definition of playing was marginally significant, Wald χ 2 (1) = 2.93, p = .09.

Our analysis revealed that the impact on recent stock-outs of modern contraceptive methods was marginally significant with a relatively narrow confidence interval (-0.12, 95% CI:-0.25–0.02, p = 0.09), possibly suggesting that more exposed facilities may be less likely to experience stock-outs.

However, in the standardized model which included all standard prognostic factors regardless of their statistical significance, the magnitude of this association decreased and was of the borderline significance (p = 0.09).

Gene E1 showed marginal significance at the level of 0.1 (p value = 0.09).

Smaller NV of right hippocampus displayed a nonsignificant trend to be correlated with worse non-dominant hand performance on 9HPT (r = - 0.24, p = 0.09).

In V3, we found a marginally significant main effect of attentional window (F(1, 9) = 3.68, p = 0.09) and an interaction between attentional window and TR (F(2, 18) = 4.02, p <0.05, Huynh-Feldt corrected).

At the species level across the 4 growing seasons, day warming showed marginally significant effects on flowering times of P. acaulis (advanced by 1.0±0.1 days; P = 0.090) and A. bidentatum (advanced by 1.1±0.5 days; P = 0.080; Fig. 3A ).

Patients showed a trend towards a greater rate of anti-saccade errors ( p = 0.09) compared to controls.

When compared to all other subtypes combined, CL tumors were more likely to express ALDH1 (17.1% versus 7.3%, p = 0.010) and they showed a trend towards an association with the CD44 hi /CD24 -/low phenotype (31.3% versus 21.7%, p = 0.090) ( Table 3 , S4 Fig ).

The other indicator used as measure of performance in Dota 2, the MMR score, revealed a borderline significant trend ( p = 0.09) in relation to IGT.

Although some increased expression of CD44 and CD24 was observed in ALDH high populations relative to ALDH low populations, the difference was not significantly significant (p = 0.09).

In contrast, our predictions were met for three genes: We found a significant inter-species difference in gene expression for the genes TAF11 (one-tailed P <0.001) and TXNIP ( P = 0.02), and a marginally significant, consistent difference ( P = 0.09) for RARS ( Figure 3 ).

Near-significant results were obtained for rs1543873 using the general and dominant models (p = 0.09 and 0.1 respectively).

Patients who presented with an unilobar lesion (n = 13) had lower number of viral copies/ml in the CSF compared with patients with other MRI patterns (n = 26), with a statistical trend toward significance (p = 0.09).

The effects were again significant for ingroup’s attitude towards the outgroup, t (24) = -2.71, p = .01, meta-stereotype valence, t (24) = 2.69, p = .01, and marginally significant for identification, t (24) = 1.79, p = .09.

Survival analysis in the validation group (n = 365) showed a clear trend towards better prognosis in GG homozygotes of the rs10757278 SNP, which confirms our initial results (p = 0.09, log-rank test).

In this group, GG homozygotes showed a trend towards a better probability of survival: p = 0.09, log-rank test.

Overall the difference in performance on the two tasks was marginally significant (p = 0.09).

Gamma For meditations belonging to the Theravada tradition, although the main effects of Condition (F<1), and Location: F(2,18) = 1.48, p>0.2 were not significant, we found a significant Condition X Location interaction: F(4,36) = 3.09, p<0.05, and separate ANOVAs at each level of the Location factor showed a significant trend at the Left Location: F(2,18) = 2.76, p = 0.09, but not the at the Right or Center (F<1 for both comparisons).

The association with physical and mental component scores was of borderline significance (p = 0.09 and p = 0.13 for linear regression analysis).

Furthermore, there was a statistical trend for a higher V̇O 2 in the third time point in SPRs ( p = 0.09).

We compared the locomotor response to morphine of these two groups, and marginally significant difference was found [main effects of group (successful/ failed): F 1, 45 = 3.01, P = 0.09; time: F 13, 585 = 11.17, P <0.001; interaction: F 13, 585 = 3.54, P <0.001; Fig 2A ].

However, for subjective sexual arousal there were marginally significant interaction effects for Stimulus X Gender, p < .09, and Stimulus X Condition X Gender, p = .06, meaning men and women tended to differ in ratings of subjective sexual arousal towards the CSs, with men rating the CS+, and women rating the CS− as slightly more arousing.

Using these Replication Scan values, an inverse correlation with participants' expected benefit scores was observed, which was marginally significant when examined alone, r (17) = −0.41, p = 0.09, but was significant after controlling for age and sex, r (17) = −0.51, p <0.05 ( Fig. 2 , bottom row).