Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp<0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For instance, nine of our candidate cancer genes were also contained in the Cancer Gene Census list, which comprises 487 genes causally linked to cancer [ 11 ], representing a highly significant enrichment ( Abl2 , Braf , Fbxw7 , Foxp1 , Ipo11 , Mllt3 , Fas , Pten , and Nf1 ; p<0.0002, Fisher’s exact test).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Methodological Quality Methodological quality as assessed by the Jadad score increased significantly over time (P<0.0001); we also reanalyzed the data minus the first period (1948–1953) (where the average Jadad score was much lower) and the increase over time was still highly significant (p = 0.0002) ( Figure 4 ).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
With age included as a covariate and using the Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiplicity, the comparison between CH-NATs and AD was highly significant (p = 0.0002) whereas the comparisons between CH-PATs and CH-NATs and between CH-PATs and AD were not significant (p = 0.09 and 0.12, respectively).
highly significantP = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Applying the GEPHAST analysis separately to each of the three groups defined by STRUCTURE (assuming each group to be homogeneous) reveals a striking pattern in which both INRA111 and BMS2753 yield highly significant associations in just one of the three groups (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0005 respectively, corrected for 30 tests).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Noteworthy, RA-related phosphoprotein profile changes are unique to the CD19 + CD27 − IgD + IgM low/− subset of autoreactive B ND cells: nominal logistic fit demonstrated that RA predictive value of the combined phosphorylation profile of several major BCR signaling proteins and Ca 2+ levels in response to BCR stimulation [2] in B ND cells was highly significant (R 2 = 1.0, p = 0.0002), while in mature naïve CD19 + IgM + B cells this predictive value was substantially less evident (R 2 = 0.505, p = 0.053).
highly significantP = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Though this gene has been used in the literature [ 39 ], performance of this gene in our mouse panel was mediocre, and as shown in Fig 6A , the raw (non-normalized) data for B2M in our mouse muscle dataset does appear to suggest a highly significant (P = 0.0002) increase in B2M expression in dystrophic tissue.
highly significantp≤0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for reproductive aging phenotypes and breast cancer risk The correlations between the PRS for each reproductive aging phenotype and the phenotype itself were highly significant as expected (p≤0.0002); yet the strength of the correlations was weak (correlation coefficient 0.16–0.21) ( Table 6 ).