Excerpts

For the OR, FA showed a nominally significant negative association at the uncorrected level (β = − 0.187, t (110) = −2.084, p =.039), but this did not survive FDR correction (FDR adjusted q = 0.118).

During the study period, there was an increasing trend toward using MCS (Cohran Armitage P = 0.039).

Assessment for significance of an SOD2 (# Ala16 alleles)-by-deployment interaction term (adjusted for both components of the interaction) to evaluate for effect modification by deployment was nominally significant, p = 0.039.

Mean duration After sleep deprivation, it is found that microstate C shows a borderline significant increase in mean duration from 62.20 ms (SD ± 6.77) to 64.68 ms (SD ± 7.49), p = 0.039.

Available P (AP) also showed marginally significant correlations with community composition (P = 0.039), while the other factors were all non-significant ( Fig. 4A ).

Greater convergence was observed in the VIS and SMN within the theta and alpha bands, and for VIS also within the gamma band, although in SMN, the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.04).

The T allele showed a protective effect in the homozygous model with marginal significance (P = 0.04, OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98; Fig. 3 ).

Pre-registered analyses isolated to false and true headlines revealed that the nudge was associated with a marginally significant reduction in false-headline sharing in both the 12.5% and 20% misinformation conditions; OR = 1.76, SE = 0.49, z = 2.05, p = 0.040 and OR = 1.70, SE = 0.40, z = 2.22, p = 0.026 respectively.

A weakly significant positive correlation was detected between high Ki67 and FOXP3 positivity ( r = 0.0146, p = 0.04).

The borderline significance of this primary outcome (p = 0.04 for vaccine efficacy differing from zero) posed the question of whether the result could have been a false positive.

In contrast, naïve CT26 cells exhibited a limited response to their own conditioned media, showing a marginally significant drop in GFP signal at 24 hpi ( P = 0.04) but no deviations in viral titer.

However, the aged effect on LT was very small and the P value was marginally significant in this study (P = 0.04).

When analysed according to study design, a significant increase in maternal homocysteine was observed among prospective studies (RoM: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14–1.44, P = 3.2 × 10 −5 ), with a marginally significant effect among retrospective studies (RoM = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00–1.14, P = 0.04) ( Figure 1 ).

A significant trend to an overrepresentation of unfavourable FAB types in CD105 hi AMLs was observed (3 vs. 10 patients; p = 0.04), while increased WBC was significantly associated with the CD105 hi cohort (mean WBC 78.4 vs. 142 G/L; p = 0.009).

2c ; P -values for G were less than 10 −9 in both cases, while GxT was marginally significant with P = 0.04 and 0.07 for Mp prr ko and Mp toc1 ko , respectively).

A nominally significant association was found between the general health and hePRS-IR (p = 0.04).

This analysis was possible only for DFS analysis for lack of sufficient data in OS population and confirmed a significant trend for reduced DFS benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in low risk subgroup (P = 0.04).

The U-ATX levels showed a weakly significant negative correlation with the ACE levels (r = −0.17, p = 0.04) (Fig. 2 c), but not with sIL-2R levels (r = −0.11, p = 0.17) (Fig. 2 d).

The analyses revealed a marginally significant difference only for unstructured stimuli (unstructured: F (1,36) = 4.2, p = 0.04, LBF = 0.06; grouped: F (1,36) = 1.26, p = 0.27, η 2 = 0.03, LBF = − 0.4).

A marginally significant 3-way interaction between group (AI and human observer), expression, and gender [F(1,233) = 4.28, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.02], probably resulted from the larger decrease in performance for male smiling faces compared to female smiling faces in human, but not AI, estimations of age.

There was a slightly significant difference in walking speed among Groups (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 75) = 2.87, p = 0.04), while no differences were observed in cadence (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 76) = 0.94, p = 0.42).

There also were no significant differences in Beta-diversity in control subjects <30 or ≥30, but among MS subjects, there was a weakly significant difference (p = 0.04) in Beta-diversity between those <30 or ≥30 (Fig.

Sprats mostly fed on small copepods ( Microcalanus sp., Calanus sp., and Acartia clausi ) and cladocerans (Table S2 a), and changes in the diet according to size were just below the level of significance ( pseudo-F 1,56 = 2.29, p = 0.04).

The differences between the training and testing sets were not statistically significant for almost all the demographic and clinical variables, except for tumor grade with a borderline significance ( P = 0.04).

The marginally significant ( P = 0.04) sex difference in infection prevalence (higher prevalence in males) shown by this previous study was not significant in this study ( P = 0.09), despite a more than 28-fold increase in sample size (50 vs 1431 individuals).