A marginally significant 3-way interaction between group (AI and human observer), expression, and gender [F(1,233) = 4.28, p = 0.04, η p 2 = 0.02], probably resulted from the larger decrease in performance for male smiling faces compared to female smiling faces in human, but not AI, estimations of age.
Excerpts
The main effect of space typology was marginally significant (Wilks’ Λ = 0.80, F(2,29) = 3.62, p = 0.04), with Nodal spaces (6939.34 ms) showing significantly longer fixation durations than Path spaces (6601.19 ms, Δ = 338.15 ms, p = 0.01), which contrasts with the non-significant difference in PRS scores between Nodal and Path spaces, suggesting that although Nodal spaces have longer fixation durations, their attention restoration efficiency is lower (PRS score = 68.03).
showed a trendp = 0.04
LA Total -GLS and LA Conduit -GLS showed a trend towards significant difference between non-hypertrophied cFD patients without LGE (LVH-/LGE-) and controls (32 ± 8%(LA Total -GLS) vs. 38 ± 5%(Controls), p = 0.04; 21 ± 5% (LA Conduit -GLS) vs. 24 ± 4% (Controls), p = 0.05, Fig. 3 C,D).
There was a slightly significant difference in walking speed among Groups (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 75) = 2.87, p = 0.04), while no differences were observed in cadence (1-way ANOVA: F (3, 76) = 0.94, p = 0.42).
Pre-registered analyses isolated to false and true headlines revealed that the nudge was associated with a marginally significant reduction in false-headline sharing in both the 12.5% and 20% misinformation conditions; OR = 1.76, SE = 0.49, z = 2.05, p = 0.040 and OR = 1.70, SE = 0.40, z = 2.22, p = 0.026 respectively.
Sprats mostly fed on small copepods ( Microcalanus sp., Calanus sp., and Acartia clausi ) and cladocerans (Table S2 a), and changes in the diet according to size were just below the level of significance ( pseudo-F 1,56 = 2.29, p = 0.04).
Additionally, observers were more likely to eat the novel food when more trials had been run at each table (Est = 0.23 ± 0.11, z = 2.07, p = 0.038), and observers that landed on the risky side of the table showed a marginally significant tendency to avoid eating novel food (Est = −1.21 ± 0.59, z = −2.06, p = 0.040).
When analysed according to study design, a significant increase in maternal homocysteine was observed among prospective studies (RoM: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14–1.44, P = 3.2 × 10 −5 ), with a marginally significant effect among retrospective studies (RoM = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00–1.14, P = 0.04) ( Figure 1 ).
borderline significanceP = 0.04
The differences between the training and testing sets were not statistically significant for almost all the demographic and clinical variables, except for tumor grade with a borderline significance ( P = 0.04).
showed a trendP = 0.040
The MD values of the cerebellum showed a trend of higher in the patient group than in the control group (1.267 ± 0.212 vs. 1.121 ± 0.196, P = 0.040).
The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database showed a significant trend for decreased STK3 mRNA expression in prostate tissues of rs7827435 variant allele (T) carriers ( P = 0.04, Figure 2A ).
Similarly, when stratified by AJCC stage, a significant trend was observed in both cohorts (log-rank P ≤ 0.04, Fig. 2 ).
The T allele showed a protective effect in the homozygous model with marginal significance (P = 0.04, OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98; Fig. 3 ).
The difference between 10% and 20% DMSO was noted as marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.04).
For both stability indices, the permuted ANOVAs revealed significances for polymer types ( p = 0.001, Table S2), whereas only τ max showed slight significance for the soil extracts including dH 2 O ( p = 0.04). τ YP showed high effect sizes of the polymer type and the soil extract with ɳp 2 = 0.51 (Table S2) and ɳp 2 = 0.20 while the interaction of both showed medium effect size of ɳp 2 = 0.12.
The nominally significant difference in interaction time when confronted to XX* and X*Y females (V = 56, p = 0.041) did not survive correction for multiple testing.
borderline significancep = 0.041
FKRGL showed borderline significance ( p = 0.041), but this did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction.
The positive correlation between the H-score of EZH and ECI2 reached marginal significance (F = 4.30, p = 0.041).
The Pearson correlation analysis showed marginally significant ( p = 0.041–0.076) moderate correlations between the working time values determined using ISO 4049 and FTIR (Fig. 4 ).
An apparent trend suggested that the severity of AKI was correlated with advancing age ( P = 0.041).
Similarly, neither pCREB1a nor pCREB1c levels varied significantly between time periods in both the non-hibernation and hibernation seasons [one-way ANOVA, p = 0.831 (pCREB1a, non-hibernation), p = 0.0413 (pCREB1a, hibernation), p = 0.282 (pCREB1c, non-hibernation), p = 0.213 (pCREB1c, hibernation)], of which, although the one-way ANOVA analysis showed a marginally significant difference for pCREB1a in the hibernation season ( p = 0.0413), the subsequent Tukey’s test showed no significant difference in pairwise comparisons (Fig. 4 e, f).
The correlation between the PS and the number of native species per site was only marginally significant when status was considered at a large (60 km) spatial scale (r = 0.372, 28 d.f., P = 0.042), and not significant for other scales.
Slightly significant relationship was found between hatching success and prey C:P ratio (one-way ANOVA, P = 0.042, Table S1 ).
8 ), cluster 3 showed a nominally significant enrichment for genes located in CeD loci ( p value = 0.042; Fig. 5 C), with around 18% of cluster 3 genes being located near a CeD locus.
The slope of the psychometric function (Model 1b, see Methods), did show a main effect of test moment (F 1,80 = 30.09, p < 0.0001), and stimulus type (F 2,80 = 44.79, p < 0.0001), and a marginally significant interaction effect (F 2,80 = 3.31, p = 0.042).