Excerpts

Although the physical activity, measured in METs, was higher in the high GNRI group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P < 0.05) (Table 1 ).

Duration of hospital stay also did not defer significantly between groups, but a higher proportion of patients in the CLD group (41.2% vs 23.8%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a difference that approached significance ( p = 0.05).

There was a weak trend towards higher percentage of dead cells in FloatHiDG and FloatMetDG ( p > 0.05) and the percentage of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in FloatMetDG compared to CTRL ( p < 0.05), but in all cases, the percentage of dead cells was under 10%.

The mast cells were found to manifest borderline significance (P = 0.050).

However, the replication analysis provided a support for this association with a marginal significance ( p = 0.05), given 22% of outpatients carried this haplotype in comparison with 18% of inpatients.

For both ME tasks t-tests were likewise highly significant for all data types (all p < . 05 , all | d | ≥ 0.96 ; cf.

Furthermore, upon accounting for these confounders, there was a borderline significant difference for TyG across the tertiles of hPDI (P-value = 0.05) and a significant difference for TG (P-value = 0.04) in the adjusted model.

L-value showed a decreasing trend throughout storage for each applied biofilm (apart from PVC), without statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05).

Figure 2 shows that this reduction in spindles was present for 10/11 investigated regions (all p-values < 0.05) and was borderline significant for the midline (p = 0.05).

Group C1 was used as a reference group, and an increasing trend was observed for VFA, SFA, HOMA-IR, BMI, WC, age, SBP, Cr, and UA, while a decreasing trend was observed for HbA1c levels ( P < 0.05).

These scores are conservative, as only those SNP—motif pairs are considered where at least one of the SNP alleles had nominally significant ( p < 0.05) similarity with a motif sequence.

A Friedman test shows a borderline significant difference in pressure pain thresholds between the groups ( p = 0.050).When groups are tested pairwise with a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, statistically significant differences can be found.

Conversely, height and BMD levels show a decreasing trend in this group ( P < 0.05).

Among the ten CpG sites significantly associated with self-reported antidepressant use reported from the Generation Scotland cohort 14 , two of them (cg03864397 annotated to CASP10 implicated in innate immune response, b = − 0.23, p = 0.03; cg26277237 annotated to KANK1 , b = 0.24, p = 0.03) were nominally significant in this meta-analysis ( p < 0.05) and with consistent direction in effect size (Supplementary Table 5 ).

In contrast, the lactose, citrate, and sodium benzoate treatment groups demonstrated a decreasing trend in DPPH radical scavenging capacity (Fig. 5 A, B and C) ( p < 0.05).

Results and analysis of effects of food ingredients on DPPH radical scavenging ability Compared to their respective control groups, the DPPH radical scavenging capacity of crude PCs extract in the glucose, sucrose, ascorbic acid, and sodium bisulfite treatment groups exhibited an increasing trend with rising concentrations ( p < 0.05).

SPM regression analysis revealed that the peak knee adduction moment of the lead leg was not associated with pelvis position during the downswing; however, it almost reached significance at p = 0.05 at transition of pelvis (TP).

For the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, older adults showed a trend towards an interaction, F (1, 52) = 3.35, adjusted p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.06, whereas younger adults showed no interaction effect, F (1, 52) = 0.02, adjusted p = 0.45, η p 2 < 0.001.

Cu:Ca and Ba:Ca only showed highly significant differences among few locations (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.05) (Fig. 6 A).

In GM the test of asymmetry was at the threshold of significance (t = 2.1, p = 0.05), though after removing some outliers (60 mM 45 ; 69 mM 5 ) the figures become more symmetrical and the tests become non-significant (t = 1.73, p = 0.1) and the remaining regions do not show significant skewness.

Anger demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation with total professional experience ( r = − 0.15, p = 0.008) and a marginally significant correlation with experience in the current unit ( r = − 0.11, p = 0.050).

In the reduced model, TMT-1 showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.050, OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.00), suggesting that better visual perception reduced the odds of injury by approximately 40%.

The only exception was the Fish Face (FF) which showed only marginal significance between ID and AD communication during this situation (p = 0.05, for details see Table S1 a, Fig. 2 ).

In terms of study design, cohort studies showed higher UA levels in severe cases with marginal significance ( P = 0.05, Hedges’ g = 2.49, 95% CI 0.02–4.97, I 2 = 98.11%, 2 studies), while cross-sectional studies did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.08, Hedges’ g = 4.00, 95% CI − 0.44 to 8.44, I 2 = 99.09%, 4 studies).

ANOVA summary typical of experimental Plackett–Burman tests indicated that the model was highly significant, due to the low probability value (p value ~ 0.05).