Excerpts

5 ), approximately 34% of the injected iron dose of PEG-PEI MNPs accumulated in the lungs compared to ~1% for CM-dextran (p = 0.057, borderline significance).

TNFSF13 was near statistical significance with SKAT in the filter with all the rare variants included in the test (p = 0.057), but this gene did not meet the inclusion criteria with the other two filters (Table 5 ).

Additionally, the α-diversity analyses in next generation sequencing (NGS) showed a difference in taxonomic units (OTUs), i.e., there were more OTUs in migrants than in Italians, but the difference was not significant, though it was close to the limit of significance (p = 0.057).

The mean time to return to work in Group 1 (cerclage) was 12.78 ± 7.06 weeks, compared to 17.25 ± 6.15 weeks in Group 2, with a near-significant difference ( p = 0.057).

Furthermore, high expression of ITGB1 was correlated with late clinical stages in both cohorts ( P = 0.019, P = 0.016, respectively) and with lymph node metastasis but with borderline significance ( P = 0.057, P = 0.062, respectively).

The test approached significance (χ 2 = 5.73, p = 0.057).

In the June 2016 sampling, the biomass was on average higher in the upper than lower soil layer, but the marginally significant soil layer × plot treatment interaction effect (P = 0.057) suggests that this difference occurred in W plots only (Fig. 1 , Table 1 ).

Other small non-coding RNAs included in the panel [i.e., RNU6, miR-143, miR-451 and miR-125 (close to significance, P = 0.057)] shows a constant expression throughout 2, 4 and 6 days after PHx and a trend of downr-egulation compared to the expression measured at day 0 (See Fig. 7 , lower row).

This effect was marginally significant after 35 days (F 3,4 = 6.09, p = 0.057) and statistically significant after 64 days (F 3,4 = 7.27, p = 0.043, Fig. 4C ).

This difference was marginally significant, t (41) = −1.962, p = 0.057, d = −0.350.

Differences for metastases from compliant tumors versus other groups were of borderline significance (p = 0.057).

GABA-currents recorded in KO UNT-oocytes showed a trend towards a decrease with respect to WT UNT-injected oocytes ( Fig. 6f , WT UNT, 100 ± 3.51%, n = 90; KO UNT, 87.21 ± 5.93%, n = 77, p = 0.057), while EC 50 and n H ( Fig. 6g ) remained similar (WT UNT, EC 50 = 93.74 ± 5.21 μM, n H = 1.16 ± 0.05, n = 13; KO UNT, EC 50 = 97.8 ± 4.30 μM, n H = 1.24 ± 0.06, n = 18).

A higher percentage of patients achieved a response irrespective of the need for IMV in the CsA plus standard of care group although the RR was almost significant 2.833 (95% CI, 0.908–8.840; p = 0.057).

The LF/HF ratio, an indicator of sympathetic activity, was strongly correlated with family income ( p = 0.001) and showed a trend toward significance for its correlation with work-study balance ( p = 0.057).

The effect of sire’s f on number of hatchlings produced was marginally non-significant and positive, such that there was no evidence of inbreeding depression in male reproductive success ( B = 7.83, 95% CI – 0.24 to 15.90, p = 0.057).

The increase in plasma CRP was borderline significant 3 h post-LPS stimulation at ZT2 ( p = 0.057; Fig. 3 e) and was significant 24 h post-LPS administration at both ZT2 and ZT14 ( p < 0.01; Fig. 3 g).

Interestingly, HDLs isolated from COVID-19 survivor patients showed a trend towards a better protection than HDLs from non-survivors ( p = 0.057).

After accounting for this dependence, TikTok videos generally received more likes ( p = 0.006), saves ( p = 0.004), and shares ( p = 0.029) than Bilibili videos, while the difference in comments approached significance ( p = 0.057).

According to the main group, no difference by gender was evident ( p ≥ 0.73); while participants with obesity showed a trend for higher depression subscores than those with overweight or normal weight (F = 2.892, p = 0.057).

The ANOVA showed an effect of background and of chromatic/luminance co m bination (F(2, 34) = 3.78, p = 0.033, ηp 2 = 0.18 and F(2, 34) = 3.83, p = 0.032, ηp 2 = 0.18 respectively), while the interaction was verging on significance (F(4, 68) = 2.12, p = 0.057, ηp 2 = 0.13).

Within-subjects comparisons (right panel) found a borderline significant effect for both treatment [ F (1,18) = 4.12, p = 0.057] and time [ F (1,18) = 4.18, p = 0.056], but a significant interaction between the two factors [ F (1,18) = 13.22, p = 0.002, η 2 = 0.78].

Centroid size has a marginally nonsignificant effect on RS1 ( z = 1.90, P = 0.057).

There was a strong trend towards a difference between treatment groups from baseline to 4 weeks (f 1,24 = 3.99, p = 0.057) (see Fig. 4 , Table 4 ).

This inversely corresponded to a pronounced difference in osteoclast numbers/mm 2 : group 2 (WT mice with external fixator and concomitant M-CSF therapy) showed lower numbers of osteoclasts/mm 2 than WT mice in group 1 (external fixator without additional M-CSF therapy), this difference was found to be of borderline significance (P = 0.057).

Further post-hoc analysis on the interpersonal trust metric showed no significant group differences for males ( p = 0.119) but a marginally significant difference for females ( p = 0.057), with female athletes in the cooperative group exhibiting stronger interpersonal trust than those in the competitive group.