Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Effects of the intervention on olfactory performance Linear mixed model (LMM) comparing the change in olfactory threshold as a result of the intervention between the two groups, controlling for age, revealed a marginally significant main effect of the intervention, F (1,318) = 3.4, p = 0.06, and a significant and robust main effect of group, F (1,318) = 199.8, p < 0.001, but no interaction of these two factors, F (1,318) = 0.02, p = 0.88, suggesting a small increase in olfactory sensitivity in both groups as a result of the intervention.
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
Accordingly, an ANOVA based on the average number of strategies used showed a significant effect of Age F (1, 45) = 11.41, p = .002, η p 2 = 0.202, a non-significant effect of offloading F (1, 45) = 1.13, p = .29, η p 2 = 0.025, and a marginally significant interaction between them F (1, 45) = 3.78, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.078.
only marginally significantp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
Although admittedly the interaction was only marginally significant, F (1, 16) = 4.111, p = 0.060, η 2 = 0.195 it is worth noting that the alerting tone reduced the differences between the optimal and non-optimal time of day by almost half (synchrony effect = 25 ms) in comparison to when the alerting tone was absent (synchrony effect = 44 ms).
a strong trendp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
While the diaphragm weight relative to body weight was higher in mdx compared to CON mice ( p < 0.01) as per the hind limb skeletal muscles, the heart weight relative to body mass was reduced in mdx compared to CON mice ( p < 0.01) and there was a strong trend for a similar genotype-dependent reduction in lung weight ( p = 0.060).
almost significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The improvement of IPSS and IIEF5 scores also correlate with amplitude of MMN wave (r = −0.639; p = 0.04, and r = 0.628; p = 0.05, respectively) and there were almost significant correlations of IPSS with the other electrophysiological parameters (latency: r = 0.546, p = 0.06; and area: r = −0.368, p = 0.06).