Effects of the intervention on olfactory performance Linear mixed model (LMM) comparing the change in olfactory threshold as a result of the intervention between the two groups, controlling for age, revealed a marginally significant main effect of the intervention, F (1,318) = 3.4, p = 0.06, and a significant and robust main effect of group, F (1,318) = 199.8, p < 0.001, but no interaction of these two factors, F (1,318) = 0.02, p = 0.88, suggesting a small increase in olfactory sensitivity in both groups as a result of the intervention.
Excerpts
Accordingly, an ANOVA based on the average number of strategies used showed a significant effect of Age F (1, 45) = 11.41, p = .002, η p 2 = 0.202, a non-significant effect of offloading F (1, 45) = 1.13, p = .29, η p 2 = 0.025, and a marginally significant interaction between them F (1, 45) = 3.78, p = .06, η p 2 = 0.078.
showed a trendP = 0.06
The sum of all visible light only showed a trend towards an increase in reflection from a Stikem glued yellow plate compared to a D41 glued yellow plate ( P = 0.06).
borderline significancep = 0.06
Mean insulin in the ChAT-ChR2 group was higher, but with borderline significance (+ 84%, p = 0.06) compared to the WT controls following laser stimulation (Fig. 1 E).
a trend towards significancep = 0.06
A trend towards significance ( p = 0.06) was found for the gender and for the interaction between Gender and Area ( p = 0.06).
Arc-length of tags Increasing energy setting from 90 to 150% across the sub-groups recorded a borderline significant decrease in the total arc-length of tags (p = 0.06; Fig. 3 B).
showed a trendp = 0.06
4 b) following MI-R showed a trend towards an increase (2.4 ± 0.5% vs 0.8 ± 0.2%, p = 0.06).
6 ), and the correlation between them was negative and marginally significant (r = − 0.25, p = 0.06).
5 a), whereas the CIRCLE condition showed only a marginal trend ( P = 0.06, Unc, around 600 ms post-onset; Fig. 5 b).
Although admittedly the interaction was only marginally significant, F (1, 16) = 4.111, p = 0.060, η 2 = 0.195 it is worth noting that the alerting tone reduced the differences between the optimal and non-optimal time of day by almost half (synchrony effect = 25 ms) in comparison to when the alerting tone was absent (synchrony effect = 44 ms).
approached significancep = 0.06
However, differences in precision between target magnitudes were significant( F 1,83 = 7.0; p = 0.02) and the interaction between domain and target magnitude also approached significance ( F 2,83 = 3.11; p = 0.06).
The change in the differences by marital status in the risk factor accumulation score was borderline significant among men (p = 0.06) but not among women (p = 0.53).
latifolia , we found a negative trend for the number of eggs laid on and into S. latifolia flowers in lit corridors compared to dark corridors (estim. = − 1.17, SE = 0.622, z = − 1.9, d.f. = 100, P = 0.060, Table 2 ).
The effect of chemical concentration on hygienic removal was marginally significant at 4 h (F 2,10 = 3.68, p = 0.06) and statistically significant at 24 h (F 2,10 = 10.90, p = 0.003).
The differences between the intensity of mixed episodes shown by different genotypes of HTR2A rs2770304 were marginally significant [H (2, N = 100) = 5.65, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.04].
close to significancep = 0.06
At transcription level, we observed that Cyclin D1 (CCND1) whose activity is required for cell cycle G1/S transition, was significantly upregulated by E2 (p = 0.04) and close to significance by P4 (p = 0.06) and E2 + P4 (0.06) at 24 h and its transcript levels seem to remain upregulated at 48 h and 72 h (Fig. 3 ).
showed a trendp = 0.060
Results showed a trend towards a significant difference of the fear pattern to the expected pattern for disgust, t (72) = 2.45, p = 0.060, η 2 = 0.08, and contempt, t (72) = 2.40, p = 0.060, η 2 = 0.07.
In our study there was a borderline significant correlation between high Ki67 expression in the metastasis and high sTK1 levels ( P = 0.06) supporting this suggestion.
evaluated well-being using the general health dimension of the health questionnaire (SF-36) and found a borderline significant difference between the intervention and control groups (p = 0.06).
showed a trendp = 0.06
60.8 mm2, p = 0.001) which showed a trend towards worsening over time (mean spinal cord CSA decrease from 61.4 mm2 to 60.6 mm2 after 6 months, p = 0.06).
showed a trendp = 0.06
However, the OFF-R group showed a trend toward decreased event-free survival (log-rank p = 0.06) (Fig. 4a ).
While the diaphragm weight relative to body weight was higher in mdx compared to CON mice ( p < 0.01) as per the hind limb skeletal muscles, the heart weight relative to body mass was reduced in mdx compared to CON mice ( p < 0.01) and there was a strong trend for a similar genotype-dependent reduction in lung weight ( p = 0.060).
However, the single injection, low-dose ferumoxytol plus AMF combination was only marginally significant at reducing tumor size (p = 0.06 for +/+ vs. −/−) (Fig. 4b ).
The improvement of IPSS and IIEF5 scores also correlate with amplitude of MMN wave (r = −0.639; p = 0.04, and r = 0.628; p = 0.05, respectively) and there were almost significant correlations of IPSS with the other electrophysiological parameters (latency: r = 0.546, p = 0.06; and area: r = −0.368, p = 0.06).
On the contrary, the relative contribution the omega-6 PUFAs showed a decreasing trend with increasing N fertilisation (p = 0.06, r2 = 0.21).