Analysis of the “essential” ROIs revealed significant correlations ( p < 0.05) in 70% of cases and marginally significant correlations ( p < 0.08) in 30% across various thresholds (Fig. 5 B left panel), indicating a consistent spatial relationship between female-biased brain anatomy and EC-effects.
Excerpts
There was a strong trend for LDM DOX treatment to reduce wheel running activity between the PRE and POST periods compared to VEH (p = 0.08; Fig. 2 A,B) and this effect was significant in the DOX + SN group ( p < 0.05; Fig. 2 A,B).
a trend towards significancep < 0.08
A trend towards significance was found for the OFC in theta band (p < 0.08), with an enhancement of outcoming information flow during the post- as compared to the pre-NS, (Fig. 5A , first row, second column).
close to significancep = 0.08
However, p-values were observed close to significance, with p = 0.08 observed, whilst the fitted slopes for both second and third dose were p = 0.13.
Our metabolomics analysis revealed a borderline significant elevation ( p = 0.08) in succinate levels in the WT sham hearts compared to SIRT5OE sham hearts (Fig. 5 B).
showed a trendP = 0.08
In addition, the richness of the faecal microbiota in the Amox group was lower than the control group (Chao, P = 0.016) but showed a trend to be higher than the Lys group (Chao, P = 0.08).
In isolated zebrafish, caffeine has anxiolytic effects at or below 25mg/L 19 ; in the current study, we observed a near-significant decrease in freezing in isolated fish exposed to the low dose of caffeine ( p = 0.08).
The interaction effect of group × change in VAS pain score on the insole-based 11-SCT time was marginally significant ( p = 0.080).
However, HPLC-based quantification of nanoparticle retention confirms the increased retention of 1 μm nanoparticles is not quite statistically significant (p = 0.08), and 2 μm nanoparticles are not significantly different after I/R injury (p = 0.24).
neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.
There is a marginally significant interaction between CD38 and CD157 ( p < 0.08).
control) were nearly significant in Experiment 3 (f (1, 39) = 3.36, η p 2 = 0.08, p < 0.08) and significant in Experiment 4 (f (1, 39) = 8.20, η p 2 = 0.17, p < 0.01).
20.5%); this difference was marginally significant (P = 0.08).
attenuata WT ( P < 0.05), between irPMT and WT ( P < 0.05), and marginally significant between irPMT and ISWT plants ( P = 0.08).
However, the overall effect of limited water across N treatments was a 9% reduction in nitrogen productivity (Table 3 ), although the effect was only marginally significant (P = 0.08).
For the TCGA-LUAD and TCGA-LUSC cohorts, LUAD patients with the B27 supertype had significantly poorer OS than those without B27 (log-rank, P = 0.049, Figure S5A-B), and LUSC patients with the A24 supertype showed a borderline significant trend of longer OS than those without A24 (log-rank, P = 0.08, Figure S5C-D).
marginally non-significantp = .08
Covarying for cognitive scores rendered risk group effects on fixation duration marginally non-significant (p = .08), and relations with continuous variation in later ASD symptoms non-significant (p = .12).
of borderline significancep = 0.08
While warming patients significantly reduced the occurrence of aBAT (p = 0.004), the administration of propranolol was of borderline significance (p = 0.08) possibly due to the comparatively small number of patients in this group (Table 1 ).
Also, there was a borderline significant relationship between early levels of S100B and GOS score (r = − 0.24, p = 0.08).
approached significancep = 0.08
Accuracy for pseudowords (250 trials) had a slightly higher correlation with WJ-Word-ID (r = 0.86, p < 0.00001) than did accuracy for real words (r = 0.74, p < 0.00001), and this difference in correlation approached significance based on William’s test (p = 0.08; Fig. 1 right panel).
almost significantlyP < 0.08
Furthermore, cats were almost significantly associated with shorter course than dogs ( P < 0.08).
However, DBS OFF patients were significantly more likely to switch after punishment (p < 0.005), and had a marginal trend to stick more often after rewards (p = 0.08) (see Table 2 ).
showed a trendp = 0.08
Injury assessment with the composite neuroscore showed a trend for impairment nine days post-injury (t(22) = 1.8, p = 0.08), although our previous study using this found no significant effect of bTBI 44 .
tendency towards significancep < 0.08
A tendency towards significance was found for the ACC in delta band when comparing post-NS and post-SC (p < 0.08, higher outcoming causal flow of information for the post-NS as compared to the post-SC, Fig. 5B ; details about CFI normalization in Materials and Methods - ‘Cortical hubs net Causal Flow of Information’).
Although the ability of the full model to predict manual dexterity performance did not quite achieve the threshold for statistical significance ( R 2 = 0.26, F (7, 39) = 1.98, p = 0.08), set shifting abilities (WCST PE ; β = −0.419, t (46) = −2.72, p = 0.01), response planning (TOL time/acc ; β = −0.370, t (46) = −2.32, p = 0.03), and working memory capacity (CBT mspan ; β = −0.366, t (46) = −2.10, p = 0.04) appear to explain unique portions of the variance in manual dexterity.