Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp < 0.081.6× alphagold
Analysis of the “essential” ROIs revealed significant correlations ( p < 0.05) in 70% of cases and marginally significant correlations ( p < 0.08) in 30% across various thresholds (Fig. 5 B left panel), indicating a consistent spatial relationship between female-biased brain anatomy and EC-effects.
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
neutral) stimuli, in both visual and olfactory modalities, decreased d’ and thus impeded discrimination between healthy and unhealthy food [ t (15) = −3.16, p < 0.01; disgust d’ = 1.91 (0.78); neutral d’ = 2.11 (0.62)] whereas an opposite, marginally significant trend emerged for the social stimuli: social disgust (vs. neutral) stimuli increased d’ [ t (15) = 1.89, p = 0.08; disgust d’ = 2.11 (0.72); neutral d’ = 1.98 (0.77)] and thus improved food healthiness discrimination.
approached significancep = 0.081.6× alpha
Accuracy for pseudowords (250 trials) had a slightly higher correlation with WJ-Word-ID (r = 0.86, p < 0.00001) than did accuracy for real words (r = 0.74, p < 0.00001), and this difference in correlation approached significance based on William’s test (p = 0.08; Fig. 1 right panel).
Rapid online assessment of reading ability.
Sci Rep · 2021 · PMC7973435
A tendency towards significance was found for the ACC in delta band when comparing post-NS and post-SC (p < 0.08, higher outcoming causal flow of information for the post-NS as compared to the post-SC, Fig. 5B ; details about CFI normalization in Materials and Methods - ‘Cortical hubs net Causal Flow of Information’).
Although the ability of the full model to predict manual dexterity performance did not quite achieve the threshold for statistical significance ( R 2 = 0.26, F (7, 39) = 1.98, p = 0.08), set shifting abilities (WCST PE ; β = −0.419, t (46) = −2.72, p = 0.01), response planning (TOL time/acc ; β = −0.370, t (46) = −2.32, p = 0.03), and working memory capacity (CBT mspan ; β = −0.366, t (46) = −2.10, p = 0.04) appear to explain unique portions of the variance in manual dexterity.