Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantqualifiedgold
DArTseq SNP marker interval 4108895_33:A > G/3196349_56:A > C showed highly significant association (LOD = 9.36) on chromosome A01 and accounted for 12.4% of genetic variation in resistance to L. maculans , followed by marker interval 100027433_25:T > C/3098300_24:G > T with LOD score of 8.17 on chromosome A01, which accounted for 18.1% of genetic variation (Table 3 ).
The proportion of digs excavated in nests varied over the fruiting season (P-value adjusted with the Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, P Holm < 0.001, Supplementary Table S1 ), showing a positive trend from its beginning until early December (day of season: 25), after which the relative abundance of digs in nests began to decline (Fig. 1a ).
highly significantqualifiedgold
The statistical analyses carried out during the study demonstrated a highly significant influence of manure (O) and differentiated mineral fertilisation (M) as well as the interaction of these factors (O x M) on the content of light PAHs (naphthalene, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, fluorene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene) and heavy PAHs (benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene) in soil (Table 1 ).
highly significantqualifiedgold
Specific PIT A main effect of response-type (F 1.63,94.2 = 109.74; p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.65) indicated a highly significant specific PIT effect (Fig. 2A ): the action that delivered the same outcome as that predicted by the stimulus (‘same’) was chosen significantly more than the other action (‘diff’: t 58 = 13.56, p < 0.001, d = 1.75) and the active baseline (‘ITI’: t 58 = 10.98, p < 0.001, d = 1.42).
highly significantqualifiedgold
In addition, a highly significant correlation (R2 = 0.89) was found between variability during the last ten familiarization throwing movements and the transfer ratio in the whole expert group, indicating that the more variable the participants, the less they were able to transfer compensations to the non-exposed task, see Fig. 6 .