Excerpts

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays determined highly significant differences between apocrine-dominant sweat (AP), saliva before exercise (SBE), and saliva after exercise (SAE) cortisol concentration (AP-SBE: p = 0.0017, AP-SAE: p = 0.0102).

3A,D : F (2,26) = 2.51, p = 0.10) was a nonsignificant trend, the number of cFos-positive cells was significantly decreased in the CPu (Fig. 3B,E : F (2,30) = 7.871, p = 0.0018) and the dorsal hippocampus (CA3) (control: 100 ± 10.3, PS: 80.7 ± 11.1, ES: 59.5 ± 9.7; F (2,30) = 3.761, p = 0.0349) of ES mice compared to controls, with a similar non-significant trend observed in the dorsal DG (Fig. 3C,F : F (2,30) = 3.217, p = 0.0542).

Following this statistical study, the model was highly significant, which was confirmed by the Fisher test of F-model value = 14.89, and 9.172 on 9 and 6 DF, and p-value = 0.001881, and 0.00695 for E 24 , and hydrocarbon degradation, respectively.

Correlation analysis revealed highly significant positive linear relationships between the extent of an elephant’s entire range and their respective hot spots (Table 3 , r = 0.75, t = 3.97, df = 12, p = 0.0019), indicating that elephants with smaller entire range extents also have smaller sized hot spots.

Group differences Multivariate statistical analyses of the relative proportion of each substance sampled from the 15 family groups revealed highly significant differences in chemical profiles of temporal (ANOSIM, global R = 0.45, p < 0.0019), genital (ANOSIM, global R = 0.45, p < 0.0001) and buccal (ANOSIM, global R = 0.39, p < 0.0001) secretions between groups (Table 2 ).

In the 9-digit sequences it was, in contrast, slightly (not significantly; p = 0.093) larger in the control task, and the same effect was highly significant in the 13-digit sequences (p = 0.002).

Nevertheless, despite the reduced number of subjects, we still observed a highly significant ventriloquist effect for invisible trials (experiment 1: 0.07 ± 0.02, t(27) = 3.22, p = 0.002; Cohen’s d: 0.61 ± 0.54; experiment 2: 0.08 ± 0.03, t(12) = 2.84, p = 0.007; Cohen’s d: 0.79 ± 0.8) (Fig. 2 ).

This was further supported by the following analyses: (1) partial correlation between stereoacuity changes and interocular baseline fixation stability—controlling for the effect of baseline stereoacuity—showed a highly significant effect for patient group with coarse or nil stereoacuity (r partial = 0.94, p = 0.002, N = 8), but failed entirely when this group was excluded (r partial = 0.075, p = 0.73, N = 24) ii) there was a significant positive correlation between fixation stability and stereoacuity improvements for the coa

The linear predictor for minutes spent in REM was marginally significant ( p = 0.067) whereas the quadratic predictor was highly significant (Fig. 4b ; p = 0.002).

b* differences were however slightly significant for the visual examination from day 28 onward (p = 0.002), but a change in L* vales was only detected as significant after 39 days (p = 0.015). ΔE values varied from 0.027 to 0.163 for the samples stored in the dark (days 7 to 46) and from 0.035 to 3.558 (days 7 to 46) when exposed to light.

The difference between the southern and northern part of the Balkans in respect to the distribution of commodities among the lipid residues is highly significant (p = .002, Fisher’s exact test).

The results of the subsequent PERMANOVA agreed with the initial analyses and again revealed a highly significant effect of the region of S. cerevisiae isolation on these wine phenotypes (Region: R 2 = 0.127, P = 0.002; Table 1b ).

Lower ratio of kallistatin to total protein in BALF showed a significant trend toward elevated neutrophil counts (P = 0.002) in BALF and increased mortality (P = 0.046).

This difference was highly significant (not one of 500 random character deletion replicates had lower node recovery than the simulated fossilization aggregate, giving P = 0.002).

In the coded linear model, the intercept (constant term) of 5.8625 ( p < 0.001) described the mean pH at the design center, whereas the coefficient for PAW treatment time (Term B) was strongly negative (− 1.0750) and statistically highly significant ( p = 0.002), corresponding to a large, standardized effect size indicating that lengthening the activation from 0 to 20 min reduced pH by more than one unit over the studied space.

Cutting speed itself contributed 20.99% and was highly significant (F = 539.29, p = 0.002).

According to the analysis, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002) was observed between the Mean and Median methods for both Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifiers, regardless of the distance metric (Euclidean or Manhattan) used.

In contrast, among prefecture women, a declining trend was observed before 2018 (APC = − 1.25%, P = 0.001), which shifted to an increasing trend after 2018 (APC = 0.82%, P = 0.002).

Simple regression analyses showed that bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), TRACP-5b and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at baseline may be significant predictors of 6-month BMD changes in both the lumbar spine (BAP: β = 0.558, p = 0.002; TRACP-5b: β = 0.611, p = 0.0005; ALP: β = 0.484, p = 0.009) and total hip (BAP: β = 0.546, p = 0.002; TRACP-5b: β = 0.482, p = 0.009; ALP: β = 0.462, p = 0.013) (Table 2 ).

For instance, a highly significant increase of UpT CDI can be observed in Chr7, Chr16, Chr17 and Chr19 (p < 0.002 in comparison to all other chromosomes by chi squared test), while an increase of DownT CDI is detected in Chr2, Chr4, Chr5, Chr6, Chr13, Chr18, Chr21 (p < 0.002).

ANCOVA analysis indicated a highly significant main effect of the “water” (p = 0.002) whereas the effects of “irradiance” or “origin” were not significant.

Among the participants, 816(60.13%) reported experiencing chronic pain, with a significant trend showing higher rates of chronic pain across increasing VAI quartiles ( P = 0.002).

These three independent variables (solid-liquid ratio, extraction times, number of extractions) had a highly significant impact on the extraction rate (F-value = 24.93, F-value = 15.28, F-value = 254.46; p = 0.002, p = 0.006, p = 0.001).

The interaction term was only marginally significant, and post-hoc t-tests revealed a decrease in response time with practice in the SI group (p = 0.002), but not in the II group (p = 0.358).

Similarly, to attentional and behavioral response, the interaction was highly significant: nomDF/denDF = 3/4089, F = 5.11, p = 0.002.