Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When considering multi-locus genotypes jointly for all feral populations, they had higher levels of genetic diversity than commercial varieties ( Table 3 ) which were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) except for observed heterozygosity ( p = 0.108 and p = 0.124 for the complete and the reduced data set, respectively); this pattern stayed the same when only considering populations (varieties) with at least four individuals (data not shown).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A meta-analysis further revealed that the overall RR for any type of fracture in T1DM patients was 1.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52-2.32], indicating a highly significant increase in fragility fracture risk even among young adults with T1DM ( P < 0.001)[ 27 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In multiple regression analysis, regular use of any omega-3 fatty acid supplements was associated with a 16% (95% confidence interval: − 28- -5%), p = 0.006 decrease in ln-transformed delta CRP level as compared to subjects who reported no or sporadic use of omega-3 fatty acid supplements (Table 3 , Model 4). There was a highly significant increase in creatine kinase values following the race ( p < 0.001), but no difference between the different categories of supplement users (Supplementary Figure 2 ).
highly significantP ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Effect of therapy on chief complaints In Group A, highly significant results were obtained in Grahana Shakti Hani ( P ≤ 0.001) and Twak Hani ( P ≤ 0.001), while significant result was found in Smarana Shakti Hani ( P = 0.004).
highly significantp< 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
One way ANOVA was applied on the results to compare the densities in different grades of OSCCs, p-value was found to be highly significant (p< 0.001) ( Table 1 ).For pair wise comparison of results Post hoc Tukey test was applied and p-value was found to be significant in all the inter comparisons (p =0.001, p<0.001) ( Table 2 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In general, the non-parametric correlations (Spearman’s rho) for attractiveness ratings between the first and second presentation for each trial type were all highly significant (all P < 0.001). 5 Changes in LPP amplitudes and self-reported attractiveness from first to second presentation are shown in Figure 4 .
extremely significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
As shown in Table 4 , the p -value of this experimental model is much less than 0.0001, indicating that this model has a high degree of significance (significant at p < 0.05, extremely significant at p < 0.001), and the lack of fit p = 0.1225 > 0.05 indicates that the experimental processes are nearly not affected by other unknown factors.