Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

a trend towards significancep < 0.0020.0× alpha
However, the correlations between IL-6 and headache (r = 0.572, p = 0.017) and between IL-6 and concentration problems (r = 0.536, p = 0.027) showed a trend towards significance (taking into account multiple comparisons, a conservative p -value cut-off was applied for statistical significance, which was set at p < 0.002).
highly significantp = .0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Subsequent pairwise comparisons confirmed a highly significant difference between the two conditions in the late time window (1900−2400 ms, SCvalid M(± SD) = .030 ± .10, CC M(± SD) = .090 ± .10, p = .002), but not in the early window (200–500 ms, SCvalid M(± SD) = –.125 ± .12, CC M(± SD) = –.117 ± .10, p = .69) or the middle window (1400–1800 ms, SCvalid M(± SD) = .026 ± .13, CC M(± SD) = .068 ± .11, p = .11).
At 3 months, PPD changes were −1.46 mm for the test quadrants and −1.25 mm coming very close to statistical significance (p = 0.002) with a further improvement to −1.74 mm in test quadrants and −1.55 mm in the control quadrants at 12 months with p values still not significant.
highly significantp=0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The strong effect of the three main risk factors as determined on univariate analysis were contacted with wildlife being highly significant (p=0.002), movement to the plains was also highly significant (p=0.001) and sharing of drinking water (p=0.017) all of which can be summarized as the strong effect of mixing between wildlife and domestic animals.
a significant trendp =0.0020.0× alphagold
Moreover, although the model adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, and total energy intake suggested a significant trend between lifelong milk exposure and cataract extraction history ( p =0.002), none of the individual groups were significantly different from the high exposure group ( p > 0.01, Table 3 ).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Importantly, we discovered a trend for a negative association between the level of histological MF and serum CITP:MMP1 ratios in the cohort as a whole ( r = −0.18; p = 0.08), which could predominantly be attributed to the highly significant association in the classical LF‐LG AS group ( r = −0.62; p = 0.002) (Figure 1C,D ).