Excerpts

This variable explains 5.2% of total OTU variation and is highly significant (pseudo-F = 11.0, P = 0.002).

A highly significant (p=0.002) moderate positive correlation was recorded in patients aged <50 and moderate positive correlation of borderline significance in males (r s =0.324, p=0.058).

After exclusion of one extreme case from the calculation as an outlier, a nearly significant correlation (after Bonferroni correction) between the balanced sum score change and the left frontal lobe decrease ( r = 0.576, p = 0.002) was revealed.

In the 5-week samples, the decrease of Mecp2 mRNA was nominally significant ( p = 0.002), with the adjusted p value falling just short of significance (0.058) (Additional file 3 : Table S2).

A highly significant linear correlation indicated that SFL duration was associated with the median SA rate of C-fiber neurons in CIP rats (p = 0.002; r 2 = 0.43) and NEP rats (p = 0.028; r 2 = 0.84).

This difference was highly significant in the noninfected plants ( p = 0.002). 2.6.

Interactions between soil inoculum, inoculum sterilization, and seed type affect biomass A highly significant three-way interaction between inoculum origin, inoculum sterilization, and A. millefolium seed type ( Table 2 A; P = 0.002) ( Fig. 3 ) revealed a complex response of naïve and experienced A. millefolium to inoculum treatments.

Nevertheless, the changes in the Fs-LASIK group are more predictable at 3 months postop, because the intergroup differences in the correlation coefficients for the J0 vector were highly significant (P=.002).

Analysis of subfamilies by age of insertion into the human genome revealed a clear trend of greater hypomethylation of Alu elements in those integrated earliest (Figure 3C; r 2 =0.74, P =0.002).

In all parietal ROIs, a highly significant Task × Model interaction ( F > 14.56, P < 0.002, for all ROIs) revealed a striking double dissociation in representational content depending on task.

The correlation between the grade of ARO and percentage of oesophagus treated at 60 Gy was not statistically significant for the whole cohort ( n = 54, r s = 0.104, p = 0.455) but highly significant for the subset of patients receiving 60 Gy to the oesophagus ( n = 25, r s = 0.591, p = 0.002).

This is driven by a highly significant difference at the first site (air 11%, ground 83%, exact test, P = 0.002) with a larger (although not significantly so) proportion at the second site (air 7%, ground 15%, P = 0.32).

The analysis of steroid levels in patients showed the following trends: Unconjugated steroids: A strong trend towards lower levels was found (n = 12 lower, n = 6 unchanged, n = 1 higher, p = 0.002).

cochlear implant hearing aid electroencephalography auditory evoked potentials source localization speech recognition bimodal benefit auditory rehabilitation Post-implantation, paired t tests ( t values) and Wilcoxon tests in case of non-normality ( z values) showed significant improvements of speech recognition with the CI ear between T3 and T4 for the OlSa S0 ( z = 3.296, ∗∗ p < 0.001), S0N0 ( t = 3.300, ∗∗ p < 0.001), and S0NHA ( z = 2.638, ∗ p < 0.009) conditions when applying the Bonferroni-corrected significance limen for significant ∗ ( p < 0.01) and highly significant ∗∗ ( p < 0.002) differences ( Figure 1 ).

A highly significant difference between the groups was evident in the data (p=0.002).

The difference between N400s elicited by English scientific metaphors and conventional metaphors was marginally significant at the left and middle parietal regions [P3: t (16) = −1.79, p = 0.091; Pz: t (16) = −1.90, p = 0.076], significant at the right frontal and central regions [F4: t (16) = −3.33, p = 0.004; C4: t (16) = −3.50, p = 0.003], and highly significant at the right parietal region [P4: t (16) = −3.65, p = 0.002].

However, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002) was observed in the Heidelberg score at 3 months in the success group (SG) compared to the failure group (FG).

A PERMANOVA to test for overall differences among the groups yielded highly significant results ( p = 0.002).

However, after 42 months, a highly significant difference was observed in the female group: a lower level in the active group (active: 56.02 ng/mL; placebo: 67.58 ng/mL; p = 0.002).

There is a weak positive intra-co-relation between ORA and IR, which is highly significant (ρ = 0.175; p = 0.002).

11 , 12 We observed a nominally significant association with TB risk in both our Chinese Han and Tibetan samples for rs557011 with a consistent direction of effect with reported results ( p = 0.002 and 0.009, respectively).

However, when separate analyses were conducted for each year, sample date was highly significant for both 2007 and 2009 (P = 0.002 in both years).

The probability of the incubation period having a MD of greater than 4 m was 71.64% (48/67), which was much higher than that of the brooding period (48.08%, 25/52) (Figure 4 .), and the values showed a highly significant difference (Chi‐squared test, χ 2 1 = 7.496, p = .002).

In survival analysis, there was a significant trend in local recurrence from groups A to C (p = 0.002, log-rank test for trend) ( Fig. 3B ).

Because all four global tests were highly significant (χ 2 >112, df = 4, P < 0.002), pair-wise tests were subsequently conducted and found to be significant as well (Table 1 ).