Excerpts

P ST for PC2 was marginally significant but within the tail of the neutral distribution ( p = 0.002), while P ST for PC3 ( p = 0.02) and PC4 ( p = 0.7) were well within the neutral distributions (Fig. 9 ).

ip transmissions show only a trend towards significance (P = 0.002).

Additionally, the composite Behavioral Management Index showed a highly significant improvement ( SE = 2.242, p = 0.002).

The relation between these variables was highly significant for mentoring (χ 2 4 =14.1, P =.002) and monitoring (χ 2 4 =22.1, P <.001).

In the RR-MS group, severity of fatigue, after controlling for depression symptoms, was associated with heightened role of the left amygdala within the entire brain network (indicated by a marginally significant positive association of betweenness centrality of this region with fatigue ratings: r =.561, p =.002).

The model was highly significant (p = 0.002) and explained 37% of the AIDS incidence variation among the municipalities (R = 0.61).

There was a significant trend with trial commencement year for the measures physical activity ( p = 0.002) and weight/BMI ( p = 0.000) and all symptoms, except for appetite loss ( p = 0.115) and pain ( p = 0.433).

The interaction effects between IL-10 response and sewage system were highly significant ( p -values = 0.002, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively, for IFN-γ, IL-5 and IL-13).

The effect of age was not significant ( OR 2.04, CI 95 : 0.47–8.92, t = 0.946, P = 0.344) and the effect of year of the beginning of military service was highly significant ( OR 2.85, CI 95 : 1.46–5.60, t = 3.052, P = 0.002).

Importantly, for MTs, the predicted interaction of Shape and Gesture was highly significant ( F [1, 23] = 12.0; p = 0.002; η 2 = 0.342).

Inhibition of VSV infection by DN-Rab5 was highly significant (p = 0.002), but the small inhibition observed with DN-Rab11 was not (p = 0.1549).

Correlations with the Frontal Behavioural Inventory In the linear regression model with the FBI 12-22 of the combined patient cohort as the dependent variable, a statistically highly significant effect was seen for the right UF (adjusted R 2 = 0.44, unstandardized B = -116 [95% CI -182, -50], p = 0.002), left UF (adjusted R 2 = 0.319, B = -98 [95% CI -167, -29], p = 0.008), the right aCi (adjusted R 2 = 0.23, B = -56 [95% CI -105, -7.6], p = 0.026) and forceps minor (adjusted R 2 = 0.26, B = -77, [95% CI -139, -14], p = 0.019) ( Fig 4 ).

The expression of these genes in the susceptible Shaw was much lower, even after challenge by the pathogen, showing a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.002) (Fig. 9 , Additional file 3 A).

Analysis of the immunolabeled areas of Aβ42 and Aβ40 fractions revealed a highly significant increase in Aβ42 deposited in treated animals relative to Aβ40 (i.e., decreased Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio), for both the facilitator‐treated (26.9% ± 4.21%, p = 0.002) and inhibitor‐treated groups (18.2% ± 2.80%, p < 0.0001) compared to control animals (47.6% ± 6.67%), without any significant difference between the treated groups ( p = 0.151) (Figure 4E ).

eLFPs and peak amplitudes were qualitatively similar (not shown), but the main effect of context was more highly significant ( dof = 484, F = 17.4, p = 0.002), further supporting that the rare-tone enhancements we observed are stronger in the two-tone oddball context.

However, for the top 300 bound regions, there is an obvious further preferential overlap among A-P early regulators as well as a moderate preference among the A-P pair rule factors and the D-V factors (Bonferroni corrected Mann Whitney tests suggest that, taken collectively, the preferential co-binding among A-P early regulators is highly significant ( P < 9 × 10 -15 ), while that among the A-P pair rule factors and the D-V factors is moderately significant ( P < 2 × 10 -3 ) for both; Additional data file 13).

The significant interaction reflects that there was no significant difference between the reporting of the two modified motif types in the unfamiliar condition (p = 0.452, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1002 and 955 ms, respectively), whereas there was a highly significant difference in the response latencies for reporting the two modified motif types in the familiar condition (p = 0.002, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1219 and 1478 ms, respectively).

An interesting additional result of subgroup analysis was a highly significant difference between the patients who underwent resection after PET staging versus patients who underwent resection without PET staging (Fig. 4 , p =0.002).

The correlation coefficient of anterior drawer displacement between examiners was highly significant in supported ADT ( R = 0.537; P = 0.002; 95% CI, 0.22–0.75), and with the numbers available, there was no significant correlation in traditional ADT ( R = 0.067; P = 0.728; 95% CI, -0.30–0.42) (Fig. 4 ).

There was a highly significant reduction in tumour volume (median reduction 68.6 cm 3 ) after treatment ( P =0.002, Figure 1 ).

Multivariable model showed aneurysm location and configuration have significant effect on operation time, and whether aneurysm was ruptured or not showed borderline significance (p = 0.002, p = 0.043, p = 0.064, respectively).

In addition, when the three data sets that examined strain effects were combined, the effect of strain on E" was highly significant (p = 0.002).

Head circumference ( F = 24.2, p < 0.0001) exhibited a highly significant variation in the population of exposed girls as did weight ( F = 3.85; p = 0.002), BMI ( F = 3.72; p = 0.003), and upper arm circumference ( F = 2.39; p = 0.04).

However, we found highly significant differences between age classes, such that juvenile snakes had higher reflectance than adults in all comparisons (all F > 10.77; p < 0.002; Fig. 3b, c , Supplementary Fig.

A highly significant ( p = 0.002) association was estimated for residential BHTM contaminants among the 48 active smokers (RR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.18).