Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
borderline significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
We indeed found a highly significant enrichment of R151C in melanoma cases compared to non-cancer controls (p = 0.002, Fisher’s exact test, Supplementary Table S3 ) and borderline significant enrichment of V92M (p = 0.055, Fisher’s exact test) and R160W (p = 0.053, Fisher’s exact test).
markedly significantP=0.0020.0× alphaqualified
The difference of cell proliferation indexes between cancer cells were well, moderate and poorly differentiated, and was markedly significant (χ 2 =26.334, P=0.002), and suggested that liver cancer cell proliferation was positively correlated with GPC3 expression (r=0.316, P=0.001).
highly significantp = .0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing JNDs of single subject data before and after training shows that this categorical effect is highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank p = .002, T = 0, r = −.845, effect size W = .89).
Haptic categorical perception of shape.
PLoS One · 2012 · PMC3416786
an increasing trendp = 0.0020.0× alphagold
Results The latent variable growth model showed a decreasing trend in frailty (S = −0.197, p = 0.013) and an increasing trend in postoperative cognitive function (S = 0.124, p = 0.002) from T1 to T3 in elderly spinal surgery patients; at the initial level, frailty was negatively correlated with cognitive function ( r = −0.452, p < 0.001), and initial levels of frailty negatively predicted the self development rate ( β = −0.516, p < 0.001), the initial level of frailty negatively predicted the development rate of postoperative cognitive function ( β = −0.321, p = 0.003), and the initial level of postoperative cognitive function positively predicted the development rate of frailty ( β = 0.192, p = 0.031).
marginally significantp = 0.0020.0× alphagold
Partial spearman correlation analysis of steroid interrelationships and concentration network analysis 52 significant partial correlations were demonstrated within the control group (Table 8 ), whilst only one partial correlation between cortisol and corticosterone was marginally significant in the ME/CFS cohort ( r = 0.885, p = 0.002, q = 0.204) (Table 9 ).