Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The findings of this study revealed that there was a highly significant difference in both DD scores (DDS) and ASFs between the control and intervention groups DDS ( p < 0.003) and ASF ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
parapsilosis isolates from RTT subjects induced highly significant levels of IL-10 compared to HC C. parapsilosis isolates and RTT C. albicans isolates ( p < 0.003, Wilcoxon rank-sum test; Fig. 3 ) suggesting an increased fungal tolerance towards these C. parapsilosis isolates, potentially favouring fungal persistence within the host.
failed to achieve significancep = 0.0030.1× alpha
Although the interaction tests failed to achieve significance, higher Pfat was significantly associated with a slower rate of enlargement of the inferior lateral ventricle in APOE ε4 carriers ( β = −36.0, p = 0.003) and/or female individuals ( β = −28.4, p = 0.005) (Table S4 ). 4.
a significant trendp = .0030.1× alphagold
In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), compared to the first quartile, individuals in the highest quartile of OBS exhibited a negative association with 10-years ASCVD (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42–0.83, p = .002), with a significant trend ( p = .003).
tendency towards significancep = 0.0030.1× alpha
We found increases that were statistically significant or show a tendency towards significance when both sexes were considered together ( Fig. 2 B1-2; distance travelled: p = 0.003, t = 0.134; immobile episodes: p = 0.059, t = 1.951), but not when males were analyzed separately ( Fig. 2 C1-2; p > 1.000 in all parameters).
highly significantp value = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The findings revealed that during the first and second waves of the pandemic, there was a highly significant difference in Ct values among moderate COVID-19 patients (p value = 0.003) and a substantial difference in Ct values among mild COVID-19 patients (p value = 0.023) [ Fig 3 ].
marginally significantp = 0.0030.1× alphagold
In addition, there was a significant interaction between Duration and Intensity, F (1, 42) = 8.7, p = .005, ηp2 = .17, due to a significant difference between the high and low magnitudes in the high intensity light bulb conditions in comparison to a marginally significant difference in the low intensity light bulb conditions (10.8, p = 0.003, vs. 8.9 seconds, p = 0.06, respectively).