Low-Dose Atipamezole Improves Thermoregulation During Anaesthetic Recovery The median rectal temperature when pigs returned to consciousness was 38.0 °C during the CTL recovery and 38.6 °C during the ATZ recovery, a difference which was highly significant ( p = 0.006) ( Figure 2 ).
Excerpts
A highly significant difference was found in the presence of HRF, more frequent in the PD group ( X 2 = 7.50; p = 0.006).
The tendency was slightly opposite in girls, resulting in a highly significant interaction between OPV at birth and sex (p = 0.006).
In rhinoplasty patients, a notably positive correlation was found between perfectionism and ruminative thinking scores ( r = 0.482; p = 0.005), while a moderately significant negative correlation was observed between self-compassion and ruminative thinking scores ( r = − 0.465; p = 0.006).
We observed no differences between patients and controls in the brightness induction test ( t 39.8 = 0.534, p = 0.60, d = 0.115; Figure 2A ), but we did observe a highly significant difference between groups in the contrast suppression test ( t 35.2 = 2.902, p = 0.006, d = 0.663; Figure 2B ).
For individuals with tertiary education, the improvement was highly significant (T = -15, p = 0.006), while participants with primary or secondary education also showed meaningful progress (T = -7.89, p = 0.042).
borderline significancep = 0.006
Results The Pearson test has showed a statistically significant correlation between Vol breast and V10, V20, V30 with borderline significance (p = 0.006; p = 0.02; p = 0.05).
showed a trendP = 0.006
Adding interaction terms for interferon plus lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon plus ribavirin, and lopinavir/ritonavir plus ribavirin in the Cox‐PH regression analysis showed a trend toward synergy between interferons and ribavirin in the full dataset (AHR = 6.04, P = 0.006; Figure 3 ), as well as in the additional analysis taking in quality assessments to account for potential bias: respiratory data limited to drug quality and in data limited to only viral load quality 1 data ( Figure S4 , Figure S5 ).
However, the main effects, the specifical concentration of spray coat and weight were highly significant correspondingly with p = 0.006 and p = 0.000 values ( p < 0.05) to the diameter of the inhibition zone.
showed a trendp = 0.006
CTBP2(1) and CTBP2(4) transcripts showed a trend towards lower expression in prostate cancer subjects treated with hormone therapy ( CTBP2(1) ; (0.87 [0.40] in untreated subjects versus 0.31[IQR0.17]; p = 0.006) and CTBP2(4) transcripts (1.01[IQR 0.99] in untreated subjects versus 0.45 [IQR0.42] in treated subjects; p = 0.006) but these results do not reach statistical significance following adjustment for multiple testing (P = < 0.004 for 12 independent tests).
However, the correlation between HMGT score and level of education was highly significant (r=0.28, p=0.006).
When we tested these groups for a linear dose response, we found a highly significant effect (p=0.006).
showed a trendp = 0.006
rs588765 and rs16969968 showed a trend for the PANAS Nervous at 4 mg (p = 0.006 and 0.007 respectively).
approached significancep = .006
However, it approached significance and demonstrated a similarly moderate effect size (HAI; r = −0.347, p = .006, n = 62).
We also verified that null distributions for the Pearson and Spearman correlation values for our main effect had means close to zero (Pearson r mean < 0.001, Spearman rho mean = 0.001) and that the correlation values observed for our main effect were highly significant compared to these null distributions (Pearson P = 0.006; Spearman P = 0.002; SI Appendix , Fig.
showed a trendp = 0.006
The increase after the DER-diet showed a trend towards higher levels compared to the relative change in the restricted diet ( p = 0.006) and the control group ( p = 0.003) ( Table 2 ).
Controlling for age, residence, economic status, education, attitudes towards wife beatings and economic autonomy, an overall trend of improvement in ANC visits was seen during the study period, with adjusted ORs of 1.2 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.3; p = 0.006) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.8, 2.2; p < 0.0001) for the years 2005 and 2011 compared to 2000, respectively.
The second GWAS SNP, rs12425791, was only borderline significant based on our threshold of one expected false discovery (HR = 1.31, p = 0.006).
Regarding Hematocrit (percentage volume occupied by red blood cells in relation to total blood volume) through analysis with ANOVA, the Genotype effect was clearly significant (F[1,16] = 9.8; p = 0.006): in WT group there was a positive percentage variation (+4.91% ± 4.29) compared to DATHET group, which showed a negative percentage variation (−8.88% ± 2.52).
While employment status was a highly significant predictor of the global EQ-VAS score ( p = 0.006), it did not reach statistical significance for the EQ-5D-5L utility index ( p = 0.279).
approached significancep = 0.006
Subsequent ANOVAs between just the three positive and negative coupling schemes showed significance between the positive and approached significance between the negative coupling schemes (F(2,20) = 6.644; p = 0.006 and F(2,20) = 2.794; p = 0.085 respectively).
Although this improvement was greatest between Visits 1 and 2 and then declined slightly between Visits 2 and 3, this was still a highly significant improvement from baseline to study end (p=0.006; Table 1 ).
showed a trendp = 0.006
Patients performed significantly worse than controls and relatives in the Random condition (Tukey’s HSD, p values < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 1.12), significantly worse than relatives in the Orthogonal condition (Tukey’s HSD, p = 0.041, Cohen’s d = 0.68), and showed a trend toward poorer Orthogonal performance versus controls that did not survive correction for multiple comparisons (uncorrected p = 0.006, Cohen’s d = 0.50).
Excluding these, the association increased in magnitude and became highly significant (β=3.528; p=0.006), roughly corresponding to one additional matched indicator in the AWW and ASHA registers for every additional 3.5 total collaboration points ( online supplemental appendix 15 ).
The decrease in HRQOL was significant in the domain of bodily pain (mean difference = -3.7, p = < .001) and borderline significant in the domain of vitality (mean difference = -3.46, p = .006).