Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP << 10 -60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This is a highly significant (P << 10 -6 ) and remarkable overlap considering that i) the number of breeds was doubled here in relation to [ 3 ], ii) the number of tissues was quite different between both studies, 16 in [ 3 ], five here; gonads, the most variable tissue, was not studied in [ 3 ], and iii) the statistical inference method was different.
highly significantp=≤0.0000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In confirmation of our hypothesis, there was a highly significant, 9.4-fold, increase in the maximal tetanic force (7.5±0.94 g versus 0.8±0.2 g; p=≤0.000001) elicited by ONS in the engrafted OST group of SOD1 G93A mice at late-stage disease, compared to age-matched untrained SOD1 G93A mice (132.4±6.8 days versus 133±6.9 days; n=7 and 11, respectively; Figure 5C–G and Appendix 1—table 3 ), although OST did not alter contractile rate characteristics ( Figure 5—figure supplement 5A–C ).
highly significantP = 0.0000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, for intergroup comparison, the difference between the two modes was found to be highly significant in both sedated and awake states if we considered inspiratory hold in PAV+ as PMI ( P = 0.000001 for both states).
nominally significantP < 1 × 10 −60.0× alphagold
6, the text now reading “Numbers of SNPs that were nominally significant ( P < 1 × 10 −6 ) in the IPF GWAS meta-analysis and also eQTL” originally read “Heatmaps presenting the numbers of eQTLs that were nominally significant ( P < 1 × 10 −6 ) in the IPF GWAS meta-analysis” and has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
highly significantP -value ≤ 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Briefly, meta-analyses were considered to be supported by robust evidence if the association was supported by more than 1000 cases, a highly significant association (the random effects model had a P -value ≤ 10 −6 , a threshold that is considered to substantially reduce false positive findings) [ 31 – 33 ], there was absence of high heterogeneity based on I 2 < 50%, the 95% PI excluded the null value, and there was no evidence of small-study effects or excess statistical significance.
an increasing trendp < 0.0000010.0× alphagold
The mortality rate for NH white group also demonstrated an increasing trend from 0.132 to 0.196 from 1999 to 2001 (APC: 22.3406; 95% CI, 4.4622 to 39.741; p < 0.000001), with a rise to 0.286 in the mortality rate from 2001 to 2018 (APC: 2.8652; 95% CI, −3.0608 to 3.5123; p = 0.119176), followed by an increase to 0.414 from 2018 till 2022 (APC: 10.7260; 95% CI, 5.725 to 20.0315; p < 0.000001).