Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When including age as continuous variable, the terms for age x month interactions were highly significant ( p = 0.0005, df = 4), suggesting an important trend to lower rates of suicide attempts following the start of AD treatment at higher ages, but not, or less so, at younger ages.
a positive trendp < 0.00050.0× alphagold
Results Using the chi-square tests of linear trend and association, evidence was found for a positive trend towards more experienced supervisors offering responses (χ 2 = 16.833, p < 0.0005, n = 215) while there was a lack of evidence of bias in the gender distribution of respondents (χ 2 = 0.482, p = 0.487, n = 203), respectively.
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In a multivariable analysis of EFS including pre-transplant IDDA v2.1 ≤ 14 / ≥15 and HCT-CI ≤ 2 / ≥3 and the interaction between these prognostic factors, as well as age at transplant and date of transplant, neither IDDA v2.1 ( p = 0.059, HR = 4.6) nor HCT-CI ( p = 0.057, HR = 7.1) were independently significant, but the interaction between these two factors combined (HCT-CI ≥ 3 and IDDA v2.1 ≥ 15) was highly significant ( p = 0.0005, HR = 18.0), Fig. 3 H.
highly significantP < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant binomial GLMM (χ 2 ML = 33.24, N obs = 196, P < 0.0005; Table 1 ) revealed that, while controlling for the potentially confounding effects of age, sex, group size, the number of zoos a subject had lived in, and task identity, Sumatran subjects were significantly more likely to solve a task than their Bornean congeners (B = 1.934, SE = 0.74, z = 2.63, P < 0.01, Fig. 1 , Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For hsa-mir-21, the DKD group showed a fold change of 0.668 ± 0.25 (SE) with a highly significant p-value (p < 0.0005), and the FSGS group showed a fold change of 2.267 ± 1.138 (SE) with statistical significance (p < 0.0077). hsa-mir-30a was downregulated in the DKD group with a fold change of 0.874 ± 0.254 (SE), not reaching statistical significance (p = 0.079), while the FSGS group showed a significant upregulation with a fold change of 1.378 ± 0.312 (SE) (p < 0.0006).
highly significantP = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Histology and immunohistochemistry On HE stained sections (sagittal and coronal), treated and untreated cords differed dramatically: vacuolization due to tissue injury (cysts) was minimal in treated cords [ Figure 2 ; a1 and b1], with a highly significant difference with controls, a sign of the neuroprotective effects of PEG [ Figure 3a ; P = 0.0005].