Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In a multivariable analysis of EFS including pre-transplant IDDA v2.1 ≤ 14 / ≥15 and HCT-CI ≤ 2 / ≥3 and the interaction between these prognostic factors, as well as age at transplant and date of transplant, neither IDDA v2.1 ( p = 0.059, HR = 4.6) nor HCT-CI ( p = 0.057, HR = 7.1) were independently significant, but the interaction between these two factors combined (HCT-CI ≥ 3 and IDDA v2.1 ≥ 15) was highly significant ( p = 0.0005, HR = 18.0), Fig. 3 H.
highly significantp = .00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A one-way ANOVA showed a highly significant cohort effect ( F = 14.20, p = .0005, η 2 = 0.69), and a pairwise post-hoc Tukey-HSD test computed with the onset indices for the ND-CI and AD-CI cohorts were not significantly different ( p = .98), but did reveal a significant difference between ND-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0007) and AD-CI and NH-acoustic ( p = .0018).
close to the level of significancep = 0.00050.0× alphagold
Ten of the transcripts were found to be differentially expressed in the same direction as in the RNA seq experiments; for three of the transcripts ( APOBEC3A , PLSCR1, IL1RN) , the fold change differences were statistically significant or close to the level of significance (p = 0.0005, p = 0.0489, p = 0.0507, respectively, Mann–Whitney test).
highly significantP ≤ 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In addition, the net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were highly significant in all multimarker lipid panels alone and when added to the base model in the training set ( P ≤ 0.0005), an observation that was reproduced in the test set using the models that were developed in the training set.
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
weakly significantqualifiedgold
In all figures, we marked the permutation test results as follows: If the number of failures was, for example, 1 in 10,000 ( p = 0.0001) or less, it was marked as highly significant (***), 5 in 10,000 ( p = 0.0005) or less, as significant (**), and 10 in 10,000 ( p = 0.001) or less, as weakly significant (*).
highly significantP = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Serum MDA levels were found to be higher (6.846 ± 1.5) than controls (4.588 ± 1.17) while SOD levels were found to be lower in women with miscarriage (2.26 ± 0.66) than that of control group (3.16 ± 1.13) and difference were found to be highly significant ( P = 0.0005, <0.0001), respectively.
highly significantp < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Nevertheless, in an independent series of experiments, registering only the total numbers of eggs produced by each female after their death, we observed a highly significant and consistent decrease ( p < 0.0005; unpaired T-test) in the number of eggs laid by females injected with ds RpCht7 (average 39) when compared to females injected with ds GFP (average 18).